Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Transgress the Law?

  1. #21
    But if a court of equity be governed by rules, why are not these brought to light in a fair system? Does the oath respect the rules or does the oath enforce them. Remembering the oath is a private affair and a "judge" thats redacted his own signature before incriminating himself.His legal oath as a bar card carrying member is signed in his full legal Name this remains on the role of attorneys list. His Business Card Name isn't a legal Name its title . Redacted his title before his private person gets busted for practicing law without license Does a legal Name come with initials or do actors use legal names a signature is endorsement or endorsement insurance.David the oath is voided when the identity or the endorsement is redacted.

  2. #22
    If you endorse private credit, you get what you pay for.

  3. #23

    Equity persona

    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    If you endorse private credit, you get what you pay for.
    Equity Judges can censor or obscure endorsement (part of a text) for legal or security purposes. Judge John [H] Doe endorsement is redacted. Endorsement in a private court you get no equity but you pay for opinions then beg a higher Endorsement with appeals when avoiding any contract real or presumptive one must demand lawful money. Equity is property and acts upon my person all public money is debt demand lawful money and censor or obscure endorsement Redacted debt. Experienced yet Compromised are inherently presented in any Private signature .The spiritual equity as being one in the spirit of Christ. As far as mysteries go Christ had no difficulties exploiting equity . Solutions beginning with Christ as no one raises hell better. Absolutely FAIRNESS isn't Judicial but determination is self. Quarrelsome is the trespass . I realize my position and limiting indulgence seems to benefit most. The balanced bantering that once was nightly here online now just a bantered few. presented and unbalanced Sarcasm and Socrates Like the orders of Socrates’ daimonion, at the beginning the orders of the English Courts of Equity were not law and had no precedential value. They were one off responses to injustices created by law.

  4. #24
    she was ownership, sailing the seas..

    she paid for the perfect storm with valuable consideration.

    nature is an open source system. one can choose to re venue into the closed source system, or be forced into this venue.

    but the sun still shines while no one pays a light bill.

  5. #25

    a payment or reward a valuable consideration

    Quote Originally Posted by george View Post
    she was ownership, sailing the seas..

    she paid for the perfect storm with valuable consideration.

    nature is an open source system. one can choose to re venue into the closed source system, or be forced into this venue.

    but the sun still shines while no one pays a light bill.
    The new obligation assumed, at the time of obtaining a thing, In law, possession is the control a person intentionally exercises toward a thing. In all cases, to ... Nevertheless, it is conceivable that a person might obtain control of a thing Property Valued & Venued before forming the intention to possess it. which is a substantial compensation for that which is obtained thereby Demanding Or Obtaining A Thing Of Value lawful money legal tender. A lawful excuse in a perfect storm ? Ignorance of those Things obtained like Property then Valued & Venued which a person is deemed to know is no excuse. Deemed or Judged a federal employee the closed source system.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •