Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Credit Union told me they will not accept my checks with a “restrictive endorsement”

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The front side of the Note (instrument) is the domain of the issuer. Therefore I agree if you are the account holder writing the check.

    This may inconvenience some people but if your bank is not interested in upholding your rights, then you should find a bank that is.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    310
    I agree. A simple signature backside of check equals endorsement of the FEDs private credit; unconditional acceptance, naked contract.

    Reminds me of the one time I had an issue with a lawful money check. Bank teller looked it over, brought it over and conferred with the head teller (I guess), came back and said they cannot accept my check with that restrictive endorsement "stamp" on it. Went over to the lobby and fed the same check into the ATM and had the money next day with no problem. Teller was wrong. The bank would accept "restrictive endorsement" checks all day long.


    Name:  lawful_money_BackImage.jpg
Views: 1578
Size:  71.9 KB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •