Thank you Allodial. I agree. In my request to "renew" I did not use the name of the CORPORATE fictions created post 1862/71. It may not make a difference in the eyes of the man or woman looking at the "Renewal" form. The may only "see" the FICTION.
This was an experiment so I could see what they would object to and cite if they did not want to make any "corrections" to their records or issue a new passort. They seem to be focused on the jurat and under penalty of perjury issue. I will not knowingly make a false statement. The challenge is I am not the Creator and I don't know everything, but only a vanishingly small bit...
Working Knot Dog vs WORKING KNOT DOG
Things that are similar are not the same. At least that is my understanding.
Interestingly, in re-examining the forms (DS-11) vs ( DS-82) the latter has this above the space for name:
"1. Name Last"
The DS-11, original application used to state: "Fill in using all block letters". Now it also reads like the DS-82.