Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Quashing the Russian Indictment

  1. #1

    Quashing the Russian Indictment

    I will simply show it to you:


    Indictment against the Russian central bank. (The address came up for at least one of the "indicted" corporations.

    My response to the division in Unity.

    The morning after service:

    Name:  Case SEALED 2 27 18.jpg
Views: 133
Size:  156.5 KB

    But fifteen minutes later (6:30 am EST) the case was back up.

    Name:  rescheduled.jpg
Views: 134
Size:  240.2 KB

    Now my guess is that when no arrests are made the Case will be dismissed in the next hearing.




  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    130
    The accusations in this case against the Russians:

    create hundreds of social media & email accounts
    stand in front of the White House holding a sign
    encourage groups not to vote
    collect intel posing as U.S. persons
    open Paypal accounts with fake ID
    purchase political ads
    create online accounts using fake personas
    post online using fake personas

    Seriously? Doesn't this happen everyday, anytime something important is at stake? I assume it does; even online forums. How does this rise to the level of criminal?
    Last edited by lorne; 06-19-18 at 01:02 AM.

  3. #3
    So I was going to buy more Suds-a-Lot and someone online said it was a tool of the banksters and central bankers profit greatly from it. And on the way i heard an ad for Tide detergent on the radio. Who do i sue for conspiracy and collusion to interfere with my election to purchase Suds-a-Lot?
    Last edited by marcel; 07-21-18 at 12:09 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    130
    the Russians. Obviously.

    Name:  09257c49a4892e1352d8529f4e23d1b0.jpg
Views: 41
Size:  25.0 KB

  5. #5
    Heh, you're right, not criminal. Case not going well for Mueller. Judge orders him to clarify Russian meddling claims. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ddled-election
    Defense says he fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections. Concord's attorney has described the election meddling charges as "make believe," arguing on Monday that Mueller's indictment against Concord "doesn't charge a crime." "There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t," said Dubelier, who added that Mueller's office alleged a "made-up crime to fit the facts they have."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •