Results 1 to 10 of 70

Thread: What I have learned so far.

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #9
    DTBA
    Guest
    Expanding on my other statement "But isn't the judge suppose to do that and not the clerk?"

    I thought the documents that are in court and stamped must be signed by the parties that are trying the case as they are on the same plane or field. So the judge is suppose to have a true oath of office signed and under seal that matches the jurisdiction on the document that needs to be tried. Therefore, the judge has standing to try the case. If the oath does not match, then he cannot try the case. If the clerk signs, that makes the clerk the judge but as you stated, need to learn more about the clerk and there obligations. This would put meaning to someone demanding to see the judges oath to verify they have jurisdiction or "challenge jurisdiction" as they call it.

    p.s. I'm not sure if these responses are being put in order. I am clicking reply on the posts at the bottom.
    Last edited by DTBA; 06-17-18 at 03:21 AM. Reason: added another thought

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •