Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: What I have learned so far.

  1. #41
    I wish to humbly apologize if I have offended someone with my posts. I am sorry for any mis-information or incorrect word usage. However, that being said. I enjoy reading information and cross referencing it with real factual documentation. I post stuff I have read and intent to educate others what I have found out. A lot I have disproved but to post information and have others put there thinking caps on and start wondering, is this correct, is in my opinion a good way to start and learn.

    I am very thankful to be on the forums though with like minded people. May God bless you all. And remember what God did for us. Jesus spilled one drop of blood for each and every one of us.

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by DTBA View Post
    I wish to humbly apologize if I have offended someone with my posts. I am sorry for any mis-information or incorrect word usage. However, that being said. I enjoy reading information and cross referencing it with real factual documentation. I post stuff I have read and intent to educate others what I have found out. A lot I have disproved but to post information and have others put there thinking caps on and start wondering, is this correct, is in my opinion a good way to start and learn.

    I am very thankful to be on the forums though with like minded people. May God bless you all. And remember what God did for us. Jesus spilled one drop of blood for each and every one of us.

    I have been occupied, if not busy. So it may be my absence making you think some kind of offense?

    I hope not.

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post

    It is like the attorney was doinking with the Pitney Bowes machinery! And the DoJ is saying they will get to it when they can? This is a FOIA appeal for viewing the oath of John Glover ROBERTS for crying out loud!!

    The DoJ defaulted on 6/4 and so Judgment will come July 4.
    This could be why your FOIA requests yield nothing:
    … Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing the Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community.
    https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/w...d-the-curtain/

  4. #44
    I have just read your response and thank you for that. I didn't really take anything anyone said as a direct offense. I may have interpenetrated what they were saying wrong. I just wanted to say I'm not trying to offend anyone for anything. I've read instances where people have gotten into heated discussions about the smallest things and wish not to partake in those type of actions. So the answer is no, you have not offended me. I enjoy discussions with you and anyone else who wish to post. I do not however wish to spread mis-information as that is why we are in this mess today or, cause a racket from my post. I wish to have ALL of my information challenged in it's validity.

    Thanks again and God Bless

  5. #45
    Speaking of information, has anyone researched the Leahy amendment No. 2529 from the Congressional record on Nov 10th 1999? It seems to stem from the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1999 due to the International Law of bankruptcy 70 year charter. From what I have researched, the bankruptcy ended in 1999 and the seats of government had to vacate due to the United States no longer existing. The President seat is the seat to control or oversee the bankruptcy. This is what is stated in the record "Leahy amendment No. 2529, to save United States taxpayers $24,000,000 by eliminating the blanket mandate relating to the filing of tax returns." congressional record November 10, 1999 S14439. Thoughts?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •