He is not talking about adhering to some doctrine of Christeandom, this is part of a larger discussion where there is separation, returning back to Ceasar back all his legal entrapments (UCC 1-201[24] - "Money" means a medium of exchange authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government and includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more nations. ) and accepting the original inheritance given:Originally Posted by David Merrill
Click here and watch for a moment.
To me, the video is highly subjective interpretation but I hear the same doctrine from the Founder of that same Roman Welfare State.
Paul spent the last five years of his life, living on the Roman dole. He actually invented a welfare system with his treason against Israel - having Roman citizenship papers and running to Felix for refuge when the Sanhedrin convicted and condemned him for it. Paul ran to the Roman Welfare State and that is where he was living in Rome, under a casual house arrest and allowed visitors and mail service through them so that the New Covenant of the Bible exists around that entire doctrine. Paul wrote what is the basis for Christianity from that position - Roman Welfare State.
"Surrender everything to the State".
From that position as citizen you then have the choice of elastic currency or fiat that is fully securitized by obligations of the United States - inelastic currency.
You cannot operate outside the scope of the post-1861 fiat. If you try to legally you will get taken every time you present gold or silver at face value. The cashier will pull out a $20 FRN and buy up your precious metal coin in a heartbeat, if he sees what has just happened.
In other words that man in the video describes becoming a transceiver utility. A conduit. I call it a conveyance utility below - reflected in that a wire can conduct current in either direction. I doubt I will be picking it up and seeing more of it. I was in that paradigm of Christendom for a long while and am not interested in looking back:
Matthew 5:5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
Matthew 5:9 - Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Matthew 5:17 - Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Whose law? Hosea 4:6 explains it some:
" seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. "
So we not do it for the Glory of Rome ourselves, but to the glory of God, albeit this is what Citizens might say " God save the Republic ". We as heirs to the living God would more then likely say " God Save the Providence ".
Now, notice the letter of Paul written to the Galatians in chapter four (4), verses one (1) and two (2). “Now I say, that the Heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; but is under TUTORS and governors until the time appointed of the father…”
Later in that same chapter when we accept the inheritance we grow up to be a Son:
Galatians 4:7 - Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.
Finally the return to nature (natural law) is spelled out for us:
Galatians 4:8 - Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.
When we keep ourselves under governors and tutors, we remain in the backsliden form of Israel.
Galatians 4:16 - For Israel slideth back as a backsliding heifer: now the LORD will feed them as a lamb in a large place.
Now our source of Authority comes from the same place as their ultimate authority, so how is it they rule over us, what have we done?
So you can probably see from this interpretation that when one accepts the law under Governors and Tutors, they remain in the backsliden Israel. aka even the suitors clause.
Our local group among others connected say it is time to correct the mistake, return back to natural law, the law of God and the inheritance originally given.
Do you not think it tyranny that they have taken from this gift to create something and they try to sell it back to us which so far they have done successfully?
Reply With Quote