Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The Common Law vs the Civil Law

  1. #1

    The Common Law vs the Civil Law

    So in my search for the common law, I have come across very interesting things, for example:


    You have to go back in history and study English and Roman history to find out how we end up with different jurisdictions for common law and civil law. See, Civil law is the successor to Roman Law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_law "Roman law forms the basic framework for civil law, the most widely used legal system today, and the terms are sometimes used synonymously."

    England was ruled by the Romans, and when they left: By the 5th century A.D. barbarian tribes were attacking other parts of the Roman Emperor Honorius decided that the Roman legions in Britain were needed elsewhere. He sent a letter to the people of Britain telling them the soldiers had to leave. They must fight the Anglo-Saxons and invaders on their own." http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/primary...roman_remains/

    The Anglo-Saxons were on their own, they had to fight to protect themselves, they could no longer count on Rome. But the City of Londinium continued to this very day as an outpost of Roman law! See what Prof. Richard Werner says here scroll to the 14 minute and 50 second mark. https://youtu.be/EC0G7pY4wRE?t=14m50s

    Now, see what is going on with the secretive City of London: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrObZ_HZZUc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1ROpIKZe-c

    Now, many people are surprised to hear that the Governments are corporations and for profit, but they are and you have to study English history to find out why.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/primary...roman_remains/ What happened to Roman Britain?

    "From the 2nd century A.D. Roman Britain found itself under attack from people who lived outside the Roman borders. The Romans thought these people were not civilised and called them barbarians . The Roman army and navy defended Britain.

    By the 5th century A.D. barbarian tribes were attacking other parts of the Roman Emperor Honorius decided that the Roman legions in Britain were needed elsewhere. He sent a letter to the people of Britain telling them the soldiers had to leave. They must fight the Anglo-Saxons and invaders on their own. In AD 410 the last Romans left."

    So, the Romans having left Britain, the Anglo-Saxons developed a concept of Natural Right to self-defense: In 1688, Englishmen ousted the Catholic King James II, and estab*lished the Protestant monarch, William of Orange, as king. Parliament finally achieved its longtime goal of asserting its legal superiority over the monarchy. One aspect of this assertion of power involved adopting a declaration of rights, listing such basic liberties as the right to petition and banning practices such as cruel and unusual punishments. The English Declaration of Rights also asserted: “That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.” The right was lim*ited to Protestants and the type of arma*ment further restricted by social class. Finally, the right was limited in scope: Parliament retained the power to regu*late or restrict the right as it saw fit to promote public safety and the general welfare of the nation. https://www.americanbar.org/publicat...lf-defens.html

    But as you saw back in the second video of the City of London, after the Battle of Hastings in 1066 William the Conqueror made a deal with the people that was running the Ancient City of London (that is to say the money changers) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHnwtkfX2k4

    So you can now see how the Dual Jurisdictions developed.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Gavilan; 06-03-18 at 03:28 AM.

  2. #2
    But what if the whole Columbus Flat-World issue is a parable? The real claim being activated is the Templar Knights from 100 years before?

    This explains a lot about the "judge" oaths being encrypted.

    Paul was a Roman citizen. Recently there is strong evidence supporting the already known - Mark was the first Gospel written. Mark was a scribe for Peter, and was much younger. Being literate and able to afford the expensive parchment, papyrus and permanent inks supports that Mark was as claimed, from Venice and therefore Roman too.

    Do you see how we agree?
    Last edited by David Merrill; 06-05-18 at 06:32 PM.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    But what if the whole Columbus Flat-World issue is a parable? The real claim being activated is the Templar Knights from 100 years before?

    This explains a lot about the "judge" oaths being encrypted.

    Paul was a Roman citizen. Recently there is strong evidence supporting the already known - Mark was the first Gospel written. Mark was a scribe for Peter, and was much younger. Being literate and able to afford the expensive parchment, papyrus and permanent inks supports that Mark was as claimed, from Venice and therefore Roman too.

    Do you see how we agree?
    Have you seen the coat of arms for the City of London?
    Name:  Geosigil.jpg
Views: 57
Size:  98.8 KBName:  col-coat.jpg
Views: 56
Size:  7.3 KB

    The left is the ancient coat of arms of the Knights Templar and the right is of the City of London.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Gavilan View Post
    Have you seen the coat of arms for the City of London?
    Name:  Geosigil.jpg
Views: 57
Size:  98.8 KBName:  col-coat.jpg
Views: 56
Size:  7.3 KB

    The left is the ancient coat of arms of the Knights Templar and the right is of the City of London.
    I found a great used book the other day! Actually two. This all falls into perfect alignment.

    Name:  History Books 2018.jpg
Views: 39
Size:  675.1 KB

    The truth revealed is that Mark scribed the Book of Mark with the revenant Jesus, Peter and Paul in Damascus where Jesus had fled. Then Mark went to Jerusalem and contacted Matthew, Luke and John for their testimony and scribed the remaining Gospels with the same purpose. - To prepare for the Return of the King to the Jerusalem throne even though He did not return three days after death, as prescribed by the prophet Zechariah.

    It seems strange that Roman civil law is what is in place in America today. Not any more. Paul was Roman too. Mark's remains were brought back to his home in Venice. I once had a Roman Catholic Priest, rogue and the Voice of the Practitioner out of Golden, for Science of Mind teaching that Mary MAGDALENE was Jesus' wife. When suddenly he shouted in my face that Jesus "Died on the Cross". He had been researching my findings and knew I had my doubts...

    But that is at the heart of the claim through a fragment of wood brought from the Holy Land to Scotland with the FRY and St CLAIR families - the legendary True Cross fragment. Blackened by age and allegedly the Blood of Jesus, giving these seafaring mariners a claim represented in Roselyn Chapel to authority and authorship of the Bible. But what we find is that this line of thought fails on two major points:

    • Jesus survived
    • the Passover Lamb was a slaughter, not a sacrifice


    Therefore the bloodied fragment, real Cross or not is meaningless as a claim. Especially in a redeemed, guiltless legal environment where the sacrifices are simply putting God's gifts to waste.

  5. #5
    Therefore please try integrating the absurdly strange behaviors of the Department of Justice and the US Supreme Court itself!

    Name:  6 9 2018 FOIA ROBERTS FOIA appeal_Page_1.jpg
Views: 42
Size:  334.3 KB
    Name:  6 9 2018 FOIA ROBERTS FOIA appeal_Page_2.jpg
Views: 43
Size:  125.5 KB

    Name:  USSC Response ROBERTS  s.jpg
Views: 45
Size:  148.1 KB

    Name:  oath.gif
Views: 39
Size:  61.0 KB

    Witness with REHNQUIST who copied the oath verbatim from the 1789 Judiciary Act we have transparency. But with ROBERTS we find the DoJ is not willing to show us his oath of office? Plus this mailing was delayed by the postal machine running out of ink, and the envelope jamming so that the bar code was improperly printed. All on what should be a standard response that should have never gone into appeal.

    The DoJ should have sent the oath on the first FOIA request, in my opinion. I believe I can make better sense of it for you readers here. This routine request for the oath of office has some major consequences in international law!


    BTW: The Appeal defaulted on June 4, 2018 days before it arrived in the mail, because of the poor quality of the DoJ mailing room. Just the same, the defaulted appeal is only saying the DoJ will get to it as soon as they can. Defaulting on June 4 means this will reach judgment on July 4 - how appropriate!
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by David Merrill; 06-10-18 at 05:25 PM.

  6. #6
    Also, from CLAUSEN's commentaries on Morals and Dogma we find a graphic explanation of the Secret Jamaica-Rambouillet Accord in 1976, where the Americans and French went into private to remove gold and install SDR's into the exchange rate of the US Dollar. And why the world sat back and let that meeting decide so much world history, in secret minutes (trust).

    Attachment 5105

    Attachment 5106

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    107
    No one likes being caught running a fake judiciary, David.

  8. #8
    I found your boulevard.
    Why the asterisk?

    Name:  GavilanBlvd.jpg
Views: 3
Size:  71.8 KB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •