Should we be stamping every presentment with "Demand is made for Lawful Money?"

[David Merrill]

There is a lot of history peripheral to this but Martin Earl is elaborating on my initial reaction to some of the examples from Motla68.

That is to say possibly the stamp alone is enough for setoff. There are no birth certificate accounts with the Fed (at least that anybody can prove) but this fellow is speaking symptomatically* of Remedy. Click here and listen for about one minute.

We already paid though. But we paid for the security of the person. That is why we saved the Fed in 1933; to pay for security (of the Person).

In other words, the instrument, whatever it is - the presentment - is being demanded in Federal Reserve Notes - redeem in lawful money by demanding it on the face of the instrument.



http://www.merchantcircle.com/busine...2.719-635-0943

* I say symptomatically because the fellow is suffering social pseudonomania. There are no birth certificate bonds. They have been fabricated as a mental model to explain the remedy effects created by the true remedy, which this group of people under this particular guru because they have sensed some successful effects and desparately wish to explain them.