Lawful Money redeemer here, how do I purchase a home?

[shikamaru]

That makes perfect sense. Whole Life Insurance.

Most of all it supports honor. Dishonor will be returned. Honor sees the deal through.

Consider this:

The idea of accessing one's bond through a birth certificate to pay for stuff in life ...

You can simulate this with a life insurance policy. The basis of the policy is one's on life. One has to capitalize the policy first however ....

[David Merrill]

Consider this:

The idea of accessing one's bond through a birth certificate to pay for stuff in life ...

You can simulate this with a life insurance policy. The basis of the policy is one's own life. One has to capitalize the policy first however ....

I have corrected "on" to "own" - one's own life. That should stimulate better discussion about ownership and insuring actual life.

Does the ownership of life actually transfer to the insurance company?

Insurance understands the bottom of that ship. (BOTTOMRY)

[shikamaru]

I have corrected "on" to "own" - one's own life. That should stimulate better discussion about ownership and insuring actual life.

Does the ownership of life actually transfer to the insurance company?

No. What one does own is the contract between themselves and the insurance company and how it performs based on structure.

[David Merrill]

I have corrected "on" to "own" - one's own life. That should stimulate better discussion about ownership and insuring actual life.

Does the ownership of life actually transfer to the insurance company?

The Redemption is at Stake. Insurance understands in bottomry. The cestui que vie trust of 1666 would declare the unredeemed dead, as in Lost at Sea. Are You Lost at C?

The birth certificate is no bond, in itself but serves as evidence of the bond for those without ownership of life.

This is an interesting approach to accessing the ability for an insurance company to enter into a contract with someone who is redeemed (presuming that’s the societal capacity of the one desiring the contract).


Referring to shikamaru’s statement “accessing one’s bond through a birth certificate”, I’m not certain what is meant by ‘bond’, except maybe connection between a human and the correlated NAME on the BC. The secular birth registration process was intended by central bankers to provide the commerce-based vessel / account per which the American people could individually choose to bond / pledge their energy to the use of the bankers’ governing scheme within the Federal Reserve System (FRS). To my comprehension, Section 16 of the Fed Act evidences Congress’s dutiful recognition of the American peoples’ “retained right” to self-govern if the demand is made to energize lawful money (national money of exchange). The contract made between the Congress and Fed bankers would be the basis for the insurance company’s officer to legally enter into a contract with a redeemed’s societal capacity to exercise his/her right to make peaceful pass-through use of the NAME instead of contracting via (from within) that vessel. The one establishing the contract with the ins co prepays his/her involvement the whole time, thus never taking a benefit from central bankers; payments should in postal Money Orders.


In support of my comment, I’m offering a document that I’ve previously posted here. I have also provided this to officers of the State of Michigan (a jurisdiction operating within the FRS) at all governmental levels that affect me. This is one of the four parts of my law Addendum provided for their benefit (the law being the supreme Law of the Land founded on the self-evident truth that “all Men are created equal”). https://drive.google.com/open?id=1sx...xSiXH8CbbAQ7k9 The bankers’ establishment of the individual NAME Trust vessel is detailed on page 5, and take notice of lines 28-31 pertaining to the effect of the Fed Act.

Maybe I should say it serves as evidence of bondage - evidence of endorsement of usury, private credit from the Fed. If you endorse fractional lending for example then you have walked into a trap of the mind. You confess to be in ownership of others by partaking as a member bank in racketeering. You endorse and back the FDIC and other insurance schemes based in the 1666 cestui que vie trust.


P.S. This Find might be more interesting than the Pope's Treaty of 1666 (attached).

Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666.

[David Merrill]

David Merrill has termed me and my husband “intrepid suitors”.

Can you remind me, when did we first meet? It has been a wonderful journey and you both are indeed intrepid.

[David Merrill]

We met in November of 2008, remotely. My husband found your Libel of Review online and within minutes we realized it pertained to our situation. We had previously become aware of what the Federal Reserve is (i.e not a federal agency). My husband had been accused of being subject to a State statute, which we knew did not apply to us. I received a cosmic revelation about contacting you. So we did. And within three days of making contact with you, I had filed my husband's Libel of Review (which applied to me too). I was the one who had to travel through a serious snowstorm to get it filed at the nearest federal courthouse, an hour and an half away from where we live. We couldn't chance my husband's liberty being taken away if he had made the trip.

Yes, an amazing journey. I recall the early brain trust days when I would fill out the template and give instructions over the phone real time. Thanki you for reminding me.

[Michael Joseph]

Yes, an amazing journey. I recall the early brain trust days when I would fill out the template and give instructions over the phone real time. Thank you for reminding me.

"What a long strange trip its been"....

[David Merrill]

"What a long strange trip its been"....

The melody plays like a Christmas Carol, when I think of you too MJ!

[Michael Joseph]

I Love you brothers and sisters!

Lately, I have been seeing that TRUST ENTITIES can be corporate in interest. As long as the image stays legal to the mathematical set. Once Persons were granted rights, then Trust Entities and TRUST ENTITIES can be governed by Superior Trustees according to Codes and/or Bylaws.

man is always the mover. No trust entity ever got up and walked across the floor. Recently a waitress was speaking to me about an AK-47 rifle. She called it an "assault rifle". So I asked her if I kicked her in the ass could I blame it on my "assault boot."

Stopping to think she said "matter contains no attributes of good or bad." RIGHT!!!

Then I asked how about incorporeal concepts or ideals? Sitting down for a minute she answered "it depends on the one giving examination." EXACTLY!!

What is required then for State to exist? Is it not a hive mind? What if you don't think in terms of materialistic concepts? What if your imagination is more alive than the world thinks?

Who then limits me? Is it not me? If I struggle against you, do I not acknowledge your authority over me? If you declare upon me, do not you bear the karma of your own issue?


Heb 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of blood and flesh, Himself also likewise took part of flesh and blood ; in order that through death He might destroy him holding the power of death, that is, the devil;

Heb 2:15 And deliver them who through fear of death were through all their lifetime subject to bondage.

Therefore we do not issue our word until and unless we are ready and willing to move on our word! If a matter does not concern us, then we do not involve us into that which is not a part of our corpus [body]. If we move or speak to that which is a trespass or tort upon the body of another, then we must stand in his/her estate and either issue judgment or take the judgment! We have found it is best to guard our tongue/mind.

[shikamaru]

Interesting notes:

Insurance companies offered mortgages on property in the US originally prior to banks of the 20th century.

Cash value in life insurance originated in the early 20th century with the decline of tontines.