Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 70 of 70

Thread: In Process: US Passport as American (not US citizen)

  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    260
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    P.S. The point being that the US cannot run [and] hide in bankruptcy for another seven years.
    I recall that Radio Shack filed bankruptcy in 2015 and 2017, so apparently the seven year wait doesn't apply to corporate Chapter 11 bankruptcy like it does to personal bankruptcy. But maybe you're talking some kind of international bankruptcy - don't know where to look for rules on that.

  2. #62
    Thanks for bringing that up.

    I am not really sure why it does not matter; at least in articulation here. Cause and effect are different on the right side of the boat. It is like the oaths, you regret when you find a "judge" with a properly formed oath but then you realize that you have uncovered a properly fungible fidelity bond. You have actually uncovered a judge among the bond-dodging and racketeering.

    So you might be correct and logic says that means I made a mistake. But I am following my dioxyribonucleic acid and there are no mistakes in that.

  3. #63
    This is a good point at which to share what I believe is a note-worthy event about oaths of office that occurred last Wednesday Sept 18. I gave a presentation to the entire Michigan Supreme Court pertaining to the necessity of a constitutionally-accurate oath of office as being the key part of an official’s properly formed authority that can be bonded. My comment drew a compliment from one of the seasoned justices. And since this thread is about passports, this also responds to David Merrill’s post equating the‘‘courtroom” as being “something called Customs”. The chief judge at the county court near me routinely refers to litigants as “customers” when he’s speaking with county commissioners about various matters. It’s custom-ary for a litigant to engage with the court’s proceedings in equity–-king-made law / case-law (attorneys as Crown agents)–-at statutory-law, applicable to U. S. citizens resident in a State trust operating such litigants’ interests reposed in the Federal Reserve System (i.e. litigants in 14th Amendment legal-person status). The FIRST MIDDLE LAST is the vessel transporting the human energy that is presumed pledged therein by the litigant/customer for the court’s debt-collection purposes.


    I maintain that one’s own nativity record is such passport, since that secures public notice of one’s Creator-endowed authority governing one’s earth-bound living-estate (social rights and obligations) if one functions from Divine Law to the best of one’s ability. Such document should identify one’s birth-state, thereby clarifying that one is a state national and not a U.S. citizen. One can also just speak that one exercises unencumbered natural-law authority, thereby conveying that one does not place trust in the Fed Res System as a resident seeking communal-benefits. Being or not being a resident is the choice, constitutionally-protected per ‘consent of the governed’.


    The occasion creating the opportunity for my presentation was the Supreme Court’s public Hearing about proposed amendments to some Michigan court rules. People are allowed three minutes to speak. The issue I addressed was the addition of a provision to the rule pertaining to orders for evictions and seizures of property, requiring that trial courts begin sending the bond of all court officers and bailiffs to the State Admin Office. I surmised that the intent was for the State to be able to verify the existence of a proper bond.


    Here’s the link to my presentation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIvB6jIislU. This can be verified per the Court’s official YouTube posting of the whole Hearing, accessed here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSXlxPzWbKQ or from the Court’s website. Take notice that the Chief Judge introduced me as “Cheryl Marie”; all other speakers were introduced by her as Mr. or Ms. First Last.


    I’m certain that the Chief Judge was giving me confirming notice about her awareness of my commerce-port-passing natural authority. I therefore did not add anything to her announcement, as confirmation that I had noticed her notice. I went right into my presentment. I had previously expressed my authority to the Court’s Administrative Docket Coordinator when I sought to reserve a place on the Hearing agenda; a reservation was required. The Coordinator sent a return email welcoming me and also inquiring: “Are you speaking on behalf of yourself or any organizations?” I answered: “Neither. I’m speaking “in my own right” pursuant to the Court’s recognition of the 1963 Constitution’s Article I, Section 23 [which is the same as the U.S. Const Amendment 9 – retained rights of the people]. In other words, I am directly affected as a Michiganian, but not from the capacity of resident. One who speaks for herself, speaks about her status as Beneficiary of governmental services.” I also gave her advance notice that I desired to speak about the oath of office that secures a court-appointed person’s bond, being the appointing judge’s oath and that I have never found a judge’s oath that complies with the one prescribed in the MI Constitution. I said I assumed that residents have been tacitly accepting altered oaths, but concluded by implying that I do not consent to such non-authority, as I added: “Since my human rights are affected, I’m with the inherent authority to speak on the matter. I should be identified as Cheryl Marie.” The Coordinator replied: “Ok, thank you!” I confirmed: “You’re welcome”. So, she as the port authority, and I as a Woman on the land of Michigan, had established an agreement that I had gained admission in my true capacity.


    During my presentation, I maintained my Divine Law obligation to respectfully provide information, thereby allowing the justices to honorably choose what to do about their own oaths that were likely to be faulty. When I got home, their oaths were in my mailbox. I had sent for them weeks before. Sure enough, they are all faulty. It is my hope that they publish correct ones before taking up my cause that I recently filed to their attention, which cause pertains to court rules being unconstitutionally implemented by judges and prosecuting attorneys with regard to my societal capacity. My post about my case in the Michigan Supreme Court is found earlier in this thread.
    Last edited by Cheryl Marie; 09-22-19 at 09:41 PM.

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    260
    Cheryl, you go girl! Very impressive. It's great to have a different perspective around here.
    Thank you for sharing and keep it up.

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by lorne View Post
    Cheryl, you go girl! Very impressive. It's great to have a different perspective around here.
    Thank you for sharing and keep it up.


    Thank you. Since you’ve requested more sharing from me, there is one more element of that Hearing to share. I think it’s a significant element. I took notice of how the bailiff called attention to the justices’ entrance. Bailiffs in the local courts merely say “All rise” and maybe add something like “the court is now in session”. But ,what an opening ceremony it was at that Supreme Court Hearing!


    Unfortunately, the Court’s YouTube posting of my visit last week begins after that ceremony. However, I’ve located a hearing (when that Court sat at a different City of Michigan) whereat the ceremony was captured on camera. This link provides evidence of the same opening that I witnessed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry4NLjSWWpM


    I’ve done a bit of investigating about the meaning of the words and phrases. For the benefit of further discussion, here’s my transcription of the ceremony:


    3 bangs of the bailiff’s gavel, then “Hear Ye, Hear Ye the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Michigan. All persons having business before this Honorable Court are admonished to draw nigh and give their attention, for the Court is now sitting. God save the United States [or UNITED STATES], the State of Michigan [or STATE…], and this Honorable Court [or COURT[.” Then one final gavel-bang.


    The phrase “Hear Ye, Hear Ye”, and the words and phase “admonished, draw nigh, give, God save” mean an agreement is being announced, in my opinion. Obviously, the subject is “business” between persons and the justices. I found the definition of Hear Ye on the website www.definitions.net The phrase generally means “listen to me” or “hear you”. "Ye" in older English is second-person plural subject, so it means the crier is talking to the crowd. What I also found is that the numerical value of Hear Ye in Chaldean Numerology is 1. The word Chaldean can mean a native of Chaldea, or pertaining to ancient Babylonia in general, and also a member of the Chaldean Catholic Church, a uniate Church of the Roman Catholic Church. I opine that the expression Hear Ye, Hear Ye electromagnetically forms an agreement: Offer made to the crowd and Acceptance of the Offer by the crowd. Listen to the expression–-the first Hear Ye is electric and the second Hear Ye is magnetic. The word “admonish” means caution, and “draw nigh” means to pull or drag forward. The meaning of “give” is obvious, but included, as notice of giving allegiance. But the God being invoked to “save”, in contrast to the typical expression “God bless ...” is of primary importance. What God is invoked? I’ve only heard “God save” in reference to the Queen of England, as hope for the long life of the monarch. So, is the intent of this Supreme Court’s opening ceremony to invoke the long life of that Court’s ability to sit in equity at law? My opinion is that it does.


    I, however, had caused a preexistant agreement with that Court to apply to my speaking to them for mutual benefit, and I had imported the law of Creator-God as the law of my cause.

  6. #66
    Cheryl Marie that is awesome! You are the type of people that inspire me to be a better man!

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Marie View Post
    Thank you. Since you’ve requested more sharing from me, there is one more element of that Hearing to share. I think it’s a significant element. I took notice of how the bailiff called attention to the justices’ entrance. Bailiffs in the local courts merely say “All rise” and maybe add something like “the court is now in session”. But ,what an opening ceremony it was at that Supreme Court Hearing!


    Unfortunately, the Court’s YouTube posting of my visit last week begins after that ceremony. However, I’ve located a hearing (when that Court sat at a different City of Michigan) whereat the ceremony was captured on camera. This link provides evidence of the same opening that I witnessed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry4NLjSWWpM


    I’ve done a bit of investigating about the meaning of the words and phrases. For the benefit of further discussion, here’s my transcription of the ceremony:


    3 bangs of the bailiff’s gavel, then “Hear Ye, Hear Ye the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Michigan. All persons having business before this Honorable Court are admonished to draw nigh and give their attention, for the Court is now sitting. God save the United States [or UNITED STATES], the State of Michigan [or STATE…], and this Honorable Court [or COURT[.” Then one final gavel-bang.


    The phrase “Hear Ye, Hear Ye”, and the words and phase “admonished, draw nigh, give, God save” mean an agreement is being announced, in my opinion. Obviously, the subject is “business” between persons and the justices. I found the definition of Hear Ye on the website www.definitions.net The phrase generally means “listen to me” or “hear you”. "Ye" in older English is second-person plural subject, so it means the crier is talking to the crowd. What I also found is that the numerical value of Hear Ye in Chaldean Numerology is 1. The word Chaldean can mean a native of Chaldea, or pertaining to ancient Babylonia in general, and also a member of the Chaldean Catholic Church, a uniate Church of the Roman Catholic Church. I opine that the expression Hear Ye, Hear Ye electromagnetically forms an agreement: Offer made to the crowd and Acceptance of the Offer by the crowd. Listen to the expression–-the first Hear Ye is electric and the second Hear Ye is magnetic. The word “admonish” means caution, and “draw nigh” means to pull or drag forward. The meaning of “give” is obvious, but included, as notice of giving allegiance. But the God being invoked to “save”, in contrast to the typical expression “God bless ...” is of primary importance. What God is invoked? I’ve only heard “God save” in reference to the Queen of England, as hope for the long life of the monarch. So, is the intent of this Supreme Court’s opening ceremony to invoke the long life of that Court’s ability to sit in equity at law? My opinion is that it does.


    I, however, had caused a preexistant agreement with that Court to apply to my speaking to them for mutual benefit, and I had imported the law of Creator-God as the law of my cause.
    I was just writing about that Unit of 1, in Chaldea. Big Surprise Cheryl Marie. LoL

  8. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by Florida Man View Post
    The way I found this place was looking for information about getting a passport document from the "united states" corporation that properly identifies/acknowledges me as on of the People in "We the People" and not some paper entity / slave.

    I applied using their DS-11 form and along with it I included a declaration that was written by myself, which was inspired by Roger Sayles example. I did not supply an SSN because I do not have one, meaning that the SSN is only issued to fictional entities and not to living people. I received a response from them about a week after sending in the papers where they asked me to sign a sworn statement that I do not have an SSN. I instead NOTICED them on their own privacy act which states that no "benefit" can be denied because of a refusal to provide ssn. I also pointed out that their own DS-11 states that all information on the form is voluntary, so they cannot claim the SSN falls under the few exemptions made in the privacy act. Lastly, I demanded that they issue my new passport with my name properly capitalized and not in "all caps" as they have before.

    After they received my repsonse, they removed my "application status" from the online status checker website. So I called in and provided the "locator" number that was included on the letter they sent me. They told me the application is "in process" but would offer no other details. I find it rather humorous. So to others pursuing this, just wanted to give some insight as to my experience.

    Interesting observations:

    - The "US Dept of State" who processes these applications refers to those applying as "applicants" and "customers. That is quite telling.

    - The letter I received from them did use proper capitalization of my name.

    - Whenever I call in to check the status, the initially cheery "customer service rep" looks up my file and then a minute later starts talking in a more serious tone.

    - They refer to the passport as "U.S. Passport" all over their website and forms, but the actual passport document is "united States of America". They are playing semantic games (as usual). There is no such thing as a "U.S. Passport" because a corporate entity "United States" has no authority nor jurisdiction to issue valid passports.
    To the original post... What's the status of your application now?

  9. #69
    Florida Man has been banned.

    As intelligence nexus between many people who share experiences like what you have quoted I get a lot of exactly that same story, over the years. It is exemplary why I banned Florida Man. Thank you for giving me a chance to think this through again.

    First off, Florida Man found his way here under a false impression, and a skewed perspective of what "saving to suitors'" is about, regarding consul. It just came up on another thread too, how this website is like a phishing website. Debt and redemption cannot exist in the same scenario, at the same time. Debt means the lack of redemption, and redemption redeems debt. The perspective that one exists while the other exists is delusion and requires a great deal of fear to acquire sustainability; another delusion - sustainable debt.

    With that said one might consider capture of the mind.

    I am uncomfortable running Google Earth videos through clouds because of copyright but I can describe them, how you can retrace the excavations of manna fabrication. I will find a better way, maybe by clearing the video through Google for approval. My point is that I am guiding teachings here, like with what I did by banishing Florida Man. By and large I verify what is the truth, show you how, and then write about it here. If somebody has remedy like a "true USA" passport on their mind, they can tell us all here. Florida Man was starting to repeat himself.

    Moving on, we come to mental dominions. Even so, territorial dominions are nothing more than drawing mental lines on the ground. Therefore we find how much weaker geophysical boundaries are than mental boundaries. The Queen of Scotland is nowhere near as threatening to Catholicism as the Queen of Scots. The latter has the hearts and minds.

    Therefore neither the US boundaries and/or the USA boundaries are real, except in the minds and that mind is primarily expressed through the Secretary and Department of State (federal). Florida man was parsing out distinctions that make no matter whatsoever regarding the use of the actual Passport he sought. The consul and embassy he sought to use while travelling abroad was described exactly the same for the USA as for the US.

    If anything, that is what would have led Florida Man to be writing here. What might be perceived as phishing would indeed be that usage by and large by Russian entities and identities to appoint the only possible candidate to do business at this time. Geopolitical social engineering. And so he has; as we finally have execution (more that 31 days) of restructure in bankruptcy of the SDR, the rule of currency since the mid-70's:


    I grabbed a Member at random, of all the members who had read that thread linked above and found the member's email to be indeed Russian, but the IP registering him was English in the Sovereign and Independent City of London. I directed that collapse of infinite information out of "random" like I typically do. If you want to know who was phishing though, look at the USDC 18-cr-32 case. That is who used the 'saving to suitors' clause of 1789 utilized as rule of law here.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 11-07-19 at 08:29 AM.

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    I think that your point eluded me.

    You are saying that the CEO of the "old" US lost his job as a member of The Board, during the bankruptcy?

    I do not believe that is true at all. With real persons going through a personal bankruptcy, they do not dissolve the personage. And many times if things are not going as well as or better than the Business Plan projected, a CEO can simply dissolve the corporation, restructure and pick up with new capital under a new name. Donald John himself has put the DONALD TRUMP through four personal bankruptcies or so I hear on Internet rumor. One thing that amazes me is how the man most think is President has earned billions in collusion with the Russians upon the human frailty of addiction, chiefly to gambling but all the other receptors are present within the casino empires this one man has built.

    So I think that the unusual thing about this bankruptcy would be how Congress played its deceptive role, and never even mentioned raising the debt ceiling, not that I was really paying much attention. But this same Congress is playing ignorant that the artificial person, the United States has not bothered changing its name. So legally I feel that Congress would be required to pass a bill excluding the US from that requirement - to open after restructure under a different name like corporations do.

    I do not watch such things close enough to speak with certainty. And I certainly understand how inconvenient it would be to change the name of the United States. But it seems to be a discrepancy in the traditions of trust law.
    I'm sorry for taking so long to respond. Life sorta happened is the best way to describe it. I had to read the posts again to realign my thoughts to the point I was trying to get at. I was only referring to the seat of government itself. Not the actual person. From my thoughts, if the international bankruptcy mandate of 70 years is over, then the debt should have been forgiven. DC should have been shut down, then restructured or reformed for other purposes for the people because it no longer operates under bankruptcy. Also, the Birth Certificate system should have been dissolved with it as well correct? DC was incorporated to allow it to operate in commerce which Congress controls. I view it as they're personal shield of protection IMO.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •