Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Revisiting the TWEA Omission

  1. #1

    Revisiting the TWEA Omission

    I have been using Cornell's law website for a long time and recently this seems much clearer:

    I enjoy how this makes it clear that these "emergencies" are for the member banks (endorsers of the Fed's private credit).

    Name:  Title 12 USC 95 TWEA_Page_1.jpg
Views: 188
Size:  608.1 KB

    Name:  Title 12 USC 95 TWEA_Page_2.jpg
Views: 174
Size:  322.5 KB

    Name:  Title 12 USC 95a & 95b TWEA omitted.jpg
Views: 180
Size:  233.5 KB

    Having the Trading with the Enemy Act omitted from the Bankers' CODE clears a lot of clutter about remedy.

    All on one neat page:

    Name:  Title 12 U S C  411.jpg
Views: 163
Size:  342.8 KB
    Last edited by David Merrill; 07-13-20 at 03:54 PM.

  2. #2
    It appears there are 2 banking systems i.e. the National Banking System and the Federal Reserve System.

    I wonder if the systems serve differing purposes ...

    In my mind, banking is one thing. Acting as reserves is another.
    Last edited by shikamaru; 04-10-21 at 12:09 PM.

  3. #3
    I wonder what happens if you omit the Your occupation on the Form 1040?

    Name:  1040 cv.jpg
Views: 35
Size:  49.5 KB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts