Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Revisiting the TWEA Omission

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 07-12-20, 09:32 AM #1
    David Merrill
    David Merrill is offline
    Administrator David Merrill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,910

    Revisiting the TWEA Omission

    I have been using Cornell's law website for a long time and recently this seems much clearer:

    https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prel...edition=prelim

    https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...edition=prelim

    https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...edition=prelim

    I enjoy how this makes it clear that these "emergencies" are for the member banks (endorsers of the Fed's private credit).


    Name: Title 12 USC 95 TWEA_Page_1.jpg Views: 558 Size: 608.1 KB

    Name: Title 12 USC 95 TWEA_Page_2.jpg Views: 496 Size: 322.5 KB

    Name: Title 12 USC 95a & 95b TWEA omitted.jpg Views: 1052 Size: 233.5 KB


    Having the Trading with the Enemy Act omitted from the Bankers' CODE clears a lot of clutter about remedy.

    All on one neat page:

    Name: Title 12 U S C 411.jpg Views: 564 Size: 342.8 KB
    Last edited by David Merrill; 07-13-20 at 03:54 PM.
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Postal Savings System - An alternate bank | Redeeming with TurboTax »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules