THE BANKERS MANIFESTO OF1892? There's a dubious document. Seems unlikely the bankers would pen something so incriminating.
https://gsiexchange.com/the-bankers-...doesnt-matter/
https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius..._of_1892_hoax/
THE BANKERS MANIFESTO OF1892? There's a dubious document. Seems unlikely the bankers would pen something so incriminating.
https://gsiexchange.com/the-bankers-...doesnt-matter/
https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius..._of_1892_hoax/
Last edited by marcel; Yesterday at 07:26 AM.
I produced a video that shows nothing is going on with the swabs used in the Sofia test. I have spent enough time on it. Your insistence is interpreted as your insecurity - at least by me. You have accepted what you like to hear from emotional outbursts that are typically removed as misinformation.
If there is a problem it is that mouse RNA is being injected into people, stabilized by Hydrogel to be a permanent alteration of DNA. It may be an improvement or inert but healthy people, especially disturbing a vibrant therapist is suffering from a possibly permanent "brain fog". So I think it was unwise.
To be concise, we hear Bill say that we need to mature mRNA.
Right there! Slide to the 4:32 Minute Mark. In that breath Bill says that the technology, chimeric reprogrammable spike protein antigen NAV's Nucleic Acid Vaccines - based in VELOCIMMUNE MICE mRNA transcripts, are "immature", meaning experimental.
I have shown you already that the MODERNA vaccine that is being injected into elderly, infants and health care workers (Heroes) first, the patent reveals in the word search for "mice" - 121 hits! It is mouse RNA being substituted on the protein spikes of COVID-19.
Watched that video the other. Got a kick out of it when the interviewer tried to say that a immune system to strong is no good for your health.
Quackery.
Banking Kings Rothschilds was working on the patent before covid19 came out.
But we can trust the Rothschilds right?
I researched that too. It is a bogus claim.
This is what I am talking about. If you pursue the wrong arguments, misinformation and false claims then people will stop listening to you. Or worse they will start spattering your misinformation further all over the Internet.
It feels like a challenge though. Even with me showing you here, you do not see. So it makes me doubt that anybody is aware of the real danger and so those for depopulation get their way through the vaccine. While those against the depopulation render themselves inert to do anything about it. So I pretty much just sit and watch.
I am thinking to "mature mRNA" and test it out on my dog. When I grow tired of one breed, I will punch in a few protein strings and change him/her into another dog. Judging by my patented vaccine, I will get it right the first try. No science needed.
P.S. The claim you make, by displaying that misinformation is that by using the term "COVID-19" in the 2020 patent application, that this inventor, whose name happens to be ROTHSCHILD, was using that same term "COVID-19" in 2015. Untrue. There are two blatant falsities:
- this "ROTHSCHILD" is directly related to any banking empire
- that he was using the term COVID-19 prior to 2019 when it was coined
- additionally, you imply that by being against your misinformation that I am for the vaccine - untrue!
I am familiar with the attorney strategy to select one single false or unfounded argument, that fails Rules of Evidence to ruin any entire opposing cause.
Last edited by David Merrill; Yesterday at 05:34 PM.
Now is time to state my views on Morgellen's Disease.
I think it entirely possible that the sebaceous glands can secrete under rare conditions fibrous exudation. These "fibers" would be soluble and evasive - as in by the time the doctor examination is detecting them, the patient is labeled delusional parasitosis.