Indiana Supreme Court Nullifies 4th Amendment in Favor of Public Policy :

[David Merrill]

Dear Admin;


My compliments! This form and format is quite complimentary to collecting quotes and making a coherent point in the thread. Thank you.

Until people realise that Lincoln's Army is still here and even expanded beyond the borders and the rules of warfare on land still are applicable the beatings will continue.

The reason we keep going round and round Motla68 is that you state a hyperbole, and then people supporting your point tangentially are presumed to be supporting against me. I have the history and what you are saying is quite skewed and improperly amplified.

I will dredge up the reason you were banished as long as you do. Simply put - you cannot and have not shown any kind of success story that does not stand directly upon the remedy I promote - the Fed Act (Title 12 U.S.C. §411) - with you spouting, Title 12 U.S.C. §411 on the face of the presentment Refused for Cause. You tried that - remember? Shall I go back and find the thread?

Okay I will accept that. I guess my position without going into much elaboration is that if one is endorsing the Federal Reserve System one is showing himself to be in conflict or enemy of the United States. This AIB call just irked me for my own personal reasons. I do not like it when 1/2 truths are parceled out to a congregation trusting in the head talker.

Banking is open to everyone! If you want you can learn to make HUGE gains from the FRS. But then you will be regulated and you may need to register your bank and maybe even do some other things I am unaware of; yet, you could remain without FR Banking via 12USC411.

I think that the proposition that Motla68 and I am making is that perhaps money is not necessary at all. But you will not see me on my soapbox boasting that money is not needed unless I can prove it. With direct experience. And when i get to that point, more than likely i will not share with the masses at large because the Scripture states if a man be ignorant, then let him be ignorant. Study to show Thyself Approved.

By the way, does anybody have a letter I can use to send to the Military! ROFLMAO.....exactly.

Point well taken - i accept your chastisement.

shabbat shalom,
mj

You would seem agreeable with remedy. I become wary when somebody tries to tell me - Remember now, this has nothing to do with Title 12 U.S.C. §411! while that is cited predominantly on the face of the R4C.

I got a message from a new member because they were afraid to confront your religious views. You impregnated confrontation with "numbskull". That tells me that you are unsure yourself - if you have to pre-insult anybody who does not share your views Michael Joseph. - That anybody who disagrees is already a numbskull...

But then I would not really know since I stopped reading what you had to say at that sentence. I just told the new member to post and enjoy it here like others. The only reason Motla68 was banished for a short spell was that he tried to hide the remedy. People can be arrogant - like you are - and pretend they have the proper interpretation and context of Scripture; that if we cannot read your mind and improve ourselves without you expressly teaching (which has drawn many complaints against Motla by the way) then we can flap about in the manure of our own ignorance. The Bible says we deserve so much, right?

Quit coming off so high-horsed as to speak down to us Michael Joseph, and start giving us examples, images and support any claims with links, current events, source documentation and soforth.

We have a new Downloads Area. Check it out!

I am not going to address the other stuff and go those rounds with you again, but where is your bona fide proof of claim that I ever asked anyone to pay me?

I bet you are an amateur NLP practitioner. What I am saying is that you should not bash me for people being willing to pay me to walk them through a lesson plan I give out all over the Internet for free. What I said was that if you asked people to pay you, you would soon be shut down as a snake oil salesman for trying to convince them, in return for the money you accepted, that the Lieber Code (Lincoln's Army as you put it above) is the prevailing law while using Title 12 U.S.C. §411, and trying to convince them that the 1913 Remedy had nothing to do with why there was Setoff for being a peaceful inhabitant.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[motla68]

The reason we keep going round and round Motla68 is that you state a hyperbole, and then people supporting your point tangentially are presumed to be supporting against me. I have the history and what you are saying is quite skewed and improperly amplified.

I will dredge up the reason you were banished as long as you do. Simply put - you cannot and have not shown any kind of success story that does not stand directly upon the remedy I promote - the Fed Act (Title 12 U.S.C. §411) - with you spouting, Title 12 U.S.C. §411 on the face of the presentment Refused for Cause. You tried that - remember? Shall I go back and find the thread?


" complaints against Motla by the way) then we can flap about in the manure of our own ignorance. The Bible says we deserve so much, right?

Quit coming off so high-horsed as to speak down to us Michael Joseph, and start giving us examples, images and support any claims with links, current events, source documentation and soforth.

I bet you are an amateur NLP practitioner. What I am saying is that you should not bash me for people being willing to pay me to walk them through a lesson plan I give out all over the Internet for free. What I said was that if you asked people to pay you, you would soon be shut down as a snake oil salesman for trying to convince them, in return for the money you accepted, that the Lieber Code (Lincoln's Army as you put it above) is the prevailing law while using Title 12 U.S.C. §411, and trying to convince them that the 1913 Remedy had nothing to do with why there was Setoff for being a peaceful inhabitant.

Yes, please go find where I put " 12 USC 411 Refuse for Cause " on an instrument? I would like to see that myself, That line seems to be quite an oxymoron to me.

It appears your using mis-direction to try and shift the focus off of you and put it on me when your not addressing the fact that you said I asked people to pay me, why are you not answering? Are you so conceited that you cannot be humbled by admitting mistake?

Amateur NLP, where did that come from? How does anyone know that you might be using such a thing in here if you figure yourself such a professional at this? So far it has worked for you, correct?
Can you show any scientific evidence showing bona fide proof of claim to that?