Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: Rod Class on RBN - Freedom Frenzy - DL & More :

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Chex View Post
    Thank you Trust Guy for that information. As the broadcast was downloading I was checking on some of the key words you mentioned.

    Found this and this .

    Also came across this The Rule of Law - In Depth

    Is there any online info on how and why the Judicial Districts were established?

    Now that you mentioned “To get the picture requires study into the Congressional Record, to find the reason for a given Amendment or Statute or Agencies existence” that interested me entirely. Do you have any info on this as well?
    One of the first 'Acts' signed by
    G.Washington was the establishment of the district courts overlapping the states/colonies. These courts were for the protection of the soon
    to be arriving First Bank. Also to assure the debts ,of the newly created legal fiction, were square on the backs of the populace.
    http://www.suijurisforum.com/america...sn-t-t632.html

    also http://www.indiebound.org/book/9781595580733

  2. #2
    Rod Class claims that the judicial power to hear cases at law or in equity have been removed from federal courts per the 11th Amendment.

    This leaves administrative and Admiralty/Maritime courts.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by shikamaru View Post
    Am I reading this right or do I need new prescriptions?



    Is this from where the concept that we have no Article III courts at the federal level save the Supreme Court?
    Does this mean what I think it means? None of the federal courts are judicial courts per the 11th Amendment? They are all administrative courts operating under color of law?
    When a suitor files the Libel of Review and a "judge" is appointed, he or she asks the clerk of court, Is this an Article III judge?

    Until lately the answer is invariably, Yes, this is an Article III judge. Lately the clerks are more inclined to answer, I don't know.

    Which serves the same purpose, Ignorance/ignoramus. A Return of ignoramus from the federal clerk is just as effective to defer competence to the suitor as a lie - Yes this is an Article III (judicial) judge.



    Quote Originally Posted by Trust Guy View Post
    In a nut shell . But there is a bit more to it . One needs to be well versed in the foundation .

    This all goes to the origin and purposes of the American court system . How and why the Judicial Districts were established and who is / has controlling authority . And the underlying reasons for the 11 th. Amendment . State Courts and their subdivisions also are effected .

    To get the picture requires study into the Congressional Record , to find the reason for a given Amendment or Statute or Agencies existence . So few are able to do so , unless there is a Federal Depository Library near by . Rod and his contributors do that . When I was an avid student , I spent as much time , if not more in the proceeding records than cross referencing points and authorities . You can not read an Act and have full understanding of the implications .

    Rod’s paperwork are quite helpful as outlines in formulating a study plan . As time allows I’ll bring some materials here to share .
    Thank you.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Trust Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seated : County of Madison
    Posts
    152
    You are most Welcome David . I'm happy to be of service .

    For all , here are 3 of Rod’s earlier papers . A simpler and much shorter work than the 113 page item .


    Original Coram Nobis - Original Corum Non Judice & Original Notice of Felony Complaint
    Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

  5. #5
    Way too many commercial interruptions on 05/26/2011 11:27 AM EDT 1:29:19 EPISODE426 - AIB RADIO RBN BROADCAST SHOW

    For such an important topic. Irritating.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Trust Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seated : County of Madison
    Posts
    152
    Here’s how Rod and company’s meeting in DC appears to have actually gone down .

    Committee on Judiciary Members ? Nobody home . All supposedly out of town . Their Calendar shows no activity from June 3 till picking back up on the 15th .

    Who was there - Zachary N. Somers , Marzulla Law , Minority Counsel House Judiciary Committee . John Conyers Jr. ( D - Michigan ) is the one Minority Member .

    Looks like those whooplaing over a meeting fell for their own excitement .

    On the other hand , this is not the meeting they have been working towards for some time . Was impromptu on the occasion of being close for a seminar in Edgewood Maryland .
    Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Trust Guy View Post
    In a nut shell . But there is a bit more to it . One needs to be well versed in the foundation .

    This all goes to the origin and purposes of the American court system . How and why the Judicial Districts were established and who is / has controlling authority . And the underlying reasons for the 11 th. Amendment . State Courts and their subdivisions also are effected .

    To get the picture requires study into the Congressional Record , to find the reason for a given Amendment or Statute or Agencies existence . So few are able to do so , unless there is a Federal Depository Library near by . Rod and his contributors do that . When I was an avid student , I spent as much time , if not more in the proceeding records than cross referencing points and authorities . You can not read an Act and have full understanding of the implications .

    Rod’s paperwork are quite helpful as outlines in formulating a study plan . As time allows I’ll bring some materials here to share .
    My understanding of the 11th Amendment was that it was passed in response to the State of Georgia getting their can kicked in Chisholm v. Georgia.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Trust Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seated : County of Madison
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by shikamaru View Post
    My understanding of the 11th Amendment was that it was passed in response to the State of Georgia getting their can kicked in Chisholm v. Georgia.
    That’s the generally circulated reason . Rod has read a few bits from the Congressional Record that indicate there is more to it . I am led to understand photo copies of the pertinent Records are included in his research and filing information . Some 25 GB of data at this time .
    Last edited by Trust Guy; 06-12-11 at 08:20 PM. Reason: spell check
    Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

  9. #9
    I will certainly delve more into this.

    So, are the federal courts administrative courts administering private trust law?

  10. #10
    Senior Member Trust Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seated : County of Madison
    Posts
    152
    David,

    You should be interested that some members of the Class Team ( Point person Marie , I think she’s in Washington ) have recently been in Court using the Conditional Acceptance and holding the 12 U.S.C. § 411 info in reserve . They are reporting some good effects so far sticking the Discharge option in their face as the only out .

    Gotta go .
    Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •