Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
A legal entity such as "Johnson Inc." chartered in the State of Mississippi would be 'natural born' with respect to, say .. the State of Mississippi. A living soul, a man named John of the Doe clan would not be a "legal entity", persay and would not necessarily be inheriting characteristics from the State of Mississippi. However, the person born in the State of Mississippi name John Doe just might.


If a publicly traded company (parent) creates a spinoff (child), the child will be deemed to have inherited characteristics of the parent--such as being publicly traded or trade-able as to stock/shares.



So the nature of the child of a corporation formed by the State of Delaware is that the child would in the 'natural course of things' have the nature/characteristics of its parent?



Natural Law?!? As in the law of inherent, intrinsic or inhereitent characteristics modeled after living organisms and applied to abstractions, legal fictions or artificial entities?
Excellent point, allodial.

Natural Law is some twisted abstraction legal term of art to suit the purposes of men.
Under "Natural Law", a child inherits his "status" from his father. Does not a child also inherit from his mother if not more so?

Natural law, natural born, .... these are ALL legal terms of art.