Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Are we still under military rule? The war that never ended.

  1. #11
    I am not sure it will manifest that way. I find myself writing...

    Crosstalk:

    I find myself in mitigation of the Lieber Code. I find myself challenging proponents that we are under it today to show us any examples more prominent in everyday life than endorsement of the national debt through the Fed? In 1973 Congress formally Ended hundreds of pages of Emergency - except of course, the Secretary and Presidents' ability to call another Bankers' Holiday when the "run" on the private credit gets so bad the Fed is in immenent danger of causing widespread bank failure in America. That's a big thing so I feel that mitigating the Lieber Code may be contradictory, especially to the proponents of it.
    I remember that in this 1995 Article there is talk of the Great Register and Carpetbaggers with their post-War survey.

    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter1.pdf
    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter2.pdf
    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter3.pdf

    Then this cash purchase specifying lawful money lifted a man out of the bondage of the fealty on property taxes.

    http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7820/transferle1.jpg
    http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8195/transferle2.jpg
    http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/5230/transferle3.jpg
    http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/6404/transferle4.jpg
    http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/7144/transferle5.jpg

    That escape from the fealty system escaped some folks because the fact of the Registry remains. - Leaving the question; Does the peaceful inhabitant have license plates at all? Without license plates you will be stopped by armed men inquiring about driver license and financial responsibility (insurance). Without insurance, the motor vehicle cannot be licensed or get the plates - so you can be paying an insurance policy but be jailed anyway, upon the cop's legal opinion that your insurance company will not cover you without a license...

    That loop does not sound very peaceful next to being responsible, yet you do not pay the fee (fealty) as though you are a Son - the heir apparent to the original estate. All you need to do is buy your car with lawful money!


    It is great to see Motla68 posting again! I really mean that. He brings things like this to light:

    This "We" as in conscience of what STS has determined.

    I will not make any other determinations in here about that, seeing that it does not conform to how STS defines it as I do, but that is besides the point being made.
    The conscience of StSC of course being David Merrill (myself) and maybe even the derogatory Planet Merrill. I built this place alright. It was funded by a brain trust, several of whom participate as members and a few more I believe like to follow links here to read occasionally. But make no mistake, when they donated to fund a new playground to replace www.suijurisclub.net they were looking at me to lay the foundation. This last week or so, as I clicked on What's New? and saw many conversations going on without me there, I felt a sense of accomplishment; that the foundation was providing the entertainment that to me, is an echo chamber that reverberates with the brain trust to provide a better understanding of remedy.

    My point is how Motla68 likes to portray me, the Conscience around here, as dictatorial - how true but for that I provide the time and effort to provide this (click here) among many other examples of reality checks. We continue to invest in the website - as you may have noticed the additions of a Downloads and Links features. We continue to provide and encourage that you all become the Conscience too - by providing support of your perspective on any matter you care to express.

    Let the Authority in "dictatorship" simply be the Record. Courts of record are by definition courts that keep an accurate record. Courts of no record are contract/equity forums. They have no authority except your signature bond - already granted consent. Traffic courts are courts of no record and the first thing a police officer brings into the record (testimony) is how the defendant identified himself to be there by signature consent (on the driver license).

    Therefore this discussion is very important but the boundaries are somewhat fleeting. In contesting Motla68's constant assertions that the Lieber Code is in full force and effect today, I become contradictory and hipocritical - at least I sound that way. So I try to describe some parameters like:

    Motla68;

    Please describe, define and cite instances of the Lieber Code being in full force and effect outside the scope of Congress ending the Emergency in 1973.




    P.S. Motla68 is by no means alone - click here.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 06-05-11 at 12:32 PM.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    I disagree that the Lieber Code is in play for people who understand the redemption of lawful money. - US Notes in the form of Federal Reserve Notes, because the hostilities of the War ended by 1865. There is no actual theater of war any longer. There is still fiat currency - and FDR took advantage of the Lieber Code in 1933 to save the Fed; but it is people endorsing private credit from the Fed that keep saving it, and people are stopping that endorsement and that makes everybody's predictions quite skewed:
    AFAIK, for the USA, the military-revenue districts could still be in place regardless of any emergency circumstances of 1933 through the Selective Service Acts and not to mention the many military bases throughout the United States of America geographic region--they are in the 'plenary zones' of the US Congress afaik. Soldiers in waiting (Selective-Service participants) are perhaps regarded as soldiers. Aren't Civil Service grades (college degree-levels) already matched up to military ranks?

    So perhaps this gets to "Why do they push 'Selective Service' on high school students?" [Without it maybe there might be no connection to the U.S. military districts for the average Joe--but then the revenue district connections are perhaps through a relationship with the IRS. ]

    The key being--if it is true that the original Congress of the United States of America was reconvened and reconstituted by Abraham Lincoln as Commander In Chief of the US Navy/Army --then the Congress convened would despite being a great look-alike it would be inferior in character to the original parliamentary body referred to in the Constitution for the United States of America although the very same Abe as CINC and President of the United States derived power. On that not: it is a well-established, 'blackletter law' that when a 'state' goes *poof* all power reverts to the creator of such state--as in -> the delegation ends. Now the notion of the original U.S.A Congress convening sine die, and the reconstruction of the United States of America being a military operation--you know 'military maintenance of government' while the sovereign is away..or something.

    Perhaps its like this:

    [1] Scrip is for on-base transactions (which are in military districts)
    [2] Lawful money is for off-base transactions.

    In Star Trek scrip was used in the Federation (the Admiralty-Maritime, Military-Revenue Zone of the Federation). Gold-pressed Latinum (as in gold shells encasing a substance called "latinum") was for 'off base' transactions. Was Gene RODDENBERRY privy to some knowledge?

    Major point..end of war..vs. prosecution of war. US's relationship to Germany since WWII might be an exemplary example of long-term prosecution of war even after the barrels are not only cold but the hands of most of the those who held the instruments of combat are long, long dead.

    'Funny thing' the Eurodollar is nothing but the US dollar in Europe or at least the term 'eurodollar' since World War II was used to refer to U.S. dollar denominated accounts in European banks.

    Eurodollars are time deposits denominated in U.S. dollars at banks outside the United States, and thus are not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve. Consequently, such deposits are subject to much less regulation than similar deposits within the U.S., allowing for higher margins. The term was originally coined for U.S. dollars in European banks, but it expanded over the years to its present definition: a U.S. dollar-denominated deposit in Tokyo or Beijing would be likewise deemed a Eurodollar deposit. There is no connection with the euro currency or the euro zone.
    Though Wikipedia puts forth the above-quoted--I learned such years ago from the US Department of Justice directly. So begs the question what is really-really-really going on?

    There are those that suggest that the occupation of Germany is closely tied to the very existence of the United Nations. And it makes sense in view of the Declaration by the United Nations--which itself is very telling in that it IMHO reveals that the United Nations was originally formed as a military alliance against Germany and other so-called "Axis Powers". And of course..the connection between the UN and the IMF is obvious.

    U.N. Charter - Article 53
    1. The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state, as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided for pursuant to Article 107 or in regional arrangements directed against renewal of aggressive policy on the part of any such state, until such time as the Organization may, on request of the Governments concerned, be charged with the responsibility for preventing further aggression by such a state.

    2. The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of this Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.
    U.N. Charter - Article 107
    Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.
    IMHO and based on arduous research: United Nations came into existence in 1942 vis-a-vis Declaration by the United Nations, January 1, 1942 (A Joint Declaration by the United States, the United Kingdom, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, China, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Poland, South Africa, Yugoslavia).

    [GERMANY IS NOT ON THE LIST!]

    From the 1942 Declaration by the United Nations:

    ...(1) Each Government pledges itself to employ its full resources, military or economic, against those members of the Tripartite Pact :and its adherents with which such government is at war.

    (2) Each Government pledges itself to cooperate with the Governments signatory hereto and not to make a separate armistice or peace with the enemies.
    You might find pledge or pledges of a similar spirit in the Declaration of Independence. But what is glaring here is an military and economic pledge (can you say MERGER?)--not just an economic one--was made which rather than preceding United Nations -> formed it!

    The difference between the UN and NATO is what?

    2. The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of this Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.
    There are quite a few that suggest that Germany (Japan too!) is still under U.S. occupation to this very day. Would it be true that the "Confederacy" "has been" an enemy of the United States?

    [ Perhaps see also "Trading With the Enemy Act"]

    From a hour or so of research this morning, I will type that in my opinion, the patch worn by your uncle in Berlin, 1947, was the S.H.A.E.F. Patch. However, some sources provide a date in 1947 when the name of the patch was changed from S.H.A.E.F. to S.H.A.P.E. (Source)
    Last edited by allodial; 06-07-11 at 05:25 AM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  3. #13
    Thank you Allodial;


    It shows that you understood my post. I am mitigating the Lieber Code in its original form being in express play, except through the money system. There are many Executive Branch-driven plans and plays that require federal participation (endorsement) to have effects upon people in the states. It is through the currency endorsement that these things do not seem voluntary.

    A suitor pointed out:

    P.S. I believe the Pres is still writing executive orders. Long after 1973.
    To which I replied:

    Very true. These EO's are published and may be Refused for Cause I believe, within 30 days albeit I have never done so. I don't feel they are any of my business. I might look into that further - I beleive there is a special division of the Federal Register for this function though.
    I took a quick look and broadcast a couple links:

    http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...sposition.html

    http://www.archives.gov/federal-regi...011.html#13572

    Perhaps its like this:

    [1] Scrip is for on-base transactions (which are in military districts)
    [2] Lawful money is for off-base transactions.
    That may be the more useful mental model. My point being that if I felt adversely affected by an Executive Order, which is to say if I kept track of the on-base activities that might boil over, I have an opportunity to get my objection on the record - Refuse for Cause. Well; now that I know where to find them and read them, maybe I can start getting around to it.

    I am thinking that the Treasury probably published the January 21, 1971 decision in the Federal Register - I don't know. The decision to stop putting more US Notes into circulation because FRNs function just as well. This matter of Title 31 §5115 - placing United States notes into a new nomenclature, United States currency notes being an Act of Congress did not go through the Federal Register as I understand Public Law (page 1, page 2). But that slick sophistry is really where the boundary line of the base was breached. Defiling parity between lawful money and elastic currency with a little word, currency!

    That however was requisite for Title 31 to become Positive Law - meaning that it affected the peaceful inhabitants outside the districts (base).

    In the section, the words “United States currency notes” are substituted for “United States notes” for clarity and consistency in the revised title.
    I am pretty certain that means it was published in the Federal Register and received no proper R4C.

    I believe understanding that disconnect might make one pretty fluent about describing the survey.


    There are quite a few that suggest that Germany (Japan too!) is still under U.S. occupation to this very day. Would it be true that the "Confederacy" "has been" an enemy of the United States?
    Something uncanny comes to mind here. Japan has a major nuclear disaster dumping radioactive iodine into the Pacific Ocean*. Germany announced its ten-year plan to completely disable its nuclear power program and was immediately hit by a nasty E-Coli outbreak that threatens the entire food supply. Well, I know that is a stretch but as easy as it would be to generate a load of infected bean sprouts, I wonder what kind of war some people think we are fighting.



    Thanks for the thought and research that went into your post!




    * I have made a minor investment $1/box of Pacific sea salt from before the nuclear disaster. With an lengthy half life, I can easily imagine that sea salt is a thing of the past in the world. Except maybe the Dead Sea but if you have ever tasted that you would believe me - that is no competition for high-end restaurants. I anticipate selling my boxes in two years for upwards of $50/box.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by David Merrill; 06-07-11 at 12:20 PM.

  4. #14
    Crosstalk on §5114(b) (click here) the IN GOD WE TRUST trust linked above:

    DM, wrote: God can make good on any agreement he goes into. Christians, in my mind identify with Israel and Judaism and that means the Laws of Moses are monetizing of sin - the animal sacrifice was an atonement process brought about by wrapping gold foil around a wooden calf and revering it for its beauty. The other component to contemplate is that Paul created the Roman Welfare State by running to Felix and accepting protective custody in Rome, where he wrote the Epistles. Romans 13 describes what Paul and I both mean to a "T".
    DM what you wrote about monetizing sin caught my attention here is my take on that:

    I have been reading the chronicle project http://thechronicleproject.org/pages/exo20.html and particularly like their version of the 10 commandments. The 'In God We Trust' Trust appears to be a problem in terms that God would not support such a thing and clearly states that in the new translation. From the Chronicle Project Exodus V7 (this is their interpretation of the translation): Do not exhaust the value of the name of the Ruler of all, your supreme one, to puff up your statements you are not allowed to speak my name to your statements or vows to try and advance their validity and in doing so make my name worthless.

    [I interject - click here.]

    Oh boy, I guess in some weird way they really did monitized sin basing money on a Trust in God that God has said "you are not allowed to speak my name to your statements or vows". Every printed FRN is an abomination to God, not only that I would think as far as the Lord is concerned their is NO trust. So we turn our SIN (breaking of GOD's commandments) into our money. Kinda twisted.

    BTW, Great thread. I have been glued to it.

    Be well,

    True Name.

    I owe a debt of gratitude for that broadcast (the brain trust echo chamber). That connected up the power of attorney God grants us as servants to fractional lending. A false weight is an abomination to the LORD, but a just weight is his delight. Proverbs 11:1. In much the same fashion, the overuse of the Name of God depreciates it too!


    P.S. Within hours of my publishing my $20M lien, chief judge Kirk Stewart SAMELSON withdrew his oath. Before, After. The AG on the lien John William SUTHERS did so from the beginning of his vacant office. Does this sort of thing reflect in the monetary system? Decide for yourself.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by David Merrill; 06-07-11 at 12:52 PM.

  5. #15
    Senior Member Trust Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seated : County of Madison
    Posts
    152
    Good points allodial .

    Lets include the 17th Amendment , adopted April 8, 1913 . Direct election of representative Senators by popular vote , rather than selection by the individual State legislatures .

    The amendment supersedes Article I, § 3 , Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which Senators were elected to represent each State . It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate , to be consistent with the method of election .

    On the Trust side , the individual Estates in Union no longer have equal representation in the central ( Federal ) governing body . Estate Trustees have no rights to recall a Senator who is not acting in the best interest of their individual Bodies Politic or boundary land use , leaving any semblance of that power to the arduous process of Recall .

    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
    when a 'state' goes *poof* all power reverts to the creator of such state--as in -> the delegation ends.
    One may also view the War and Reconstruction Act as implementation of a hostile takeover. The United States of America went *poof* when the Confederate Estates , part of the creators of the Union , withdrew and reformed . The US of A could have continued more peacefully, but rather took the war course in eventually seizing the Trust Res of the Confederate States and Converted them to another Use .

    All in all Breach of Trust .

    In conversation with the Constitutional Law Professor of my acquaintance , he conceded the States COULD reform the Federal Government by asserting their Trust authority and reassigning Trustees for the Central Government .

    Andrew Johnson - Veto of the First Reconstruction Act - March 2, 1867


    I have examined the bill "to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States" with the care and the anxiety which its transcendent importance is calculated to awaken. I am unable to give it my assent for reasons so grave that I hope a statement of them may have some influence on the minds of the patriotic and enlightened men with whom the decision must ultimately rest.

    The bill places all the people of the ten States therein named under the absolute domination of military rulers; and the preamble undertakes to give the reason upon which the measure is based and the ground upon which it is justified. It declares that there exists in those States no legal governments and no adequate protection for life or property, and asserts the necessity of enforcing peace and good order within their limits. Is this true as matter of fact?

    It is not denied that the States in question have each of them an actual government, with all the powers- executive, judicial, and legislative-which properly belong to a free state. They are organized like the other States of the Union, and, like them, they make, administer, and execute the laws which concern their domestic affairs. An existing de facto government, exercising such functions as these, is itself the law of the state upon all matters within its jurisdiction. To pronounce the supreme law-making power of an established state illegal is to say that law itself is unlawful.

    The provisions which these governments have made for the preservation of order, the suppression of crime, and the redress of private injuries are in substance and principle the same as those which prevail in the Northern States and in other civilized countries. .

    The bill, however, would seem to show upon its face that the establishment of peace and good order is not its real object. The fifth section declares that the preceding sections shall cease to operate in any State where certain events shall have happened. . . . All these conditions must be fulfilled before the people of any of these States can be relieved from the bondage of military domination; but when they are fulfilled, then immediately the pains and penalties of the bill are to cease, no matter whether there be peace and order or not, and without any reference to the security of life or property. The excuse given for the bill in the preamble is admitted by the bill itself not to be real. The military rule which it establishes is plainly to be used, not for any purpose of order or for the prevention of crime, but solely as a means of coercing the people into the adoption of principles and measures to which it is known that they are opposed, and upon which they have an undeniable right to exercise their own judgment.

    More at link above .

    Additional Resource : First Reconstruction Act - March 2, 1867 - An Act to provide for the more efficient Government of the Rebel States

    [Passed over President Johnson’s veto March 2, 1867]
    Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Trust Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seated : County of Madison
    Posts
    152
    The “On Base / Off Base” discussion sparked a remembrance of dealing with Indians “Off the Reservation” , pursuant to The Buck Act , 4 USC § 110 .

    Bun once applied for a Sales Tax Permit in California . She based the application on definitions of “in this State” and that she “might” unknowingly deal with some “Indians off the Reservation” . The Permit was issued , with her land legals as location ( NW corner of the SW , etc ) . Even the receiving envelope from the Franchise Tax Board was addressed this way .

    As it turned out , the Permit ID coding was for a sales tax exempt operation . I don’t recall that the application was specific to this tax status . Don’t think it was .

    “In this State” was also at issue when the Department of Motor Vehicles pulled her Pickup and Sedan VINs out of the computer system .

    Here’s a few supposed tax cases I might look into one day .

    Johnson v. City and County of Denver, 186 Colo. 398, 527 P.2d 883 (1974):
    Federal employees prosecuted for failure to pay occupational tax. U.S. had jurisdiction at place where these employees worked. Court held tax was not income tax for Buck Act purposes, and ruled Denver had no jurisdiction to levy tax in question.

    Rountree v. City and County of Denver, 197 Colo. 497, 596 P.2d 739 (1979):
    Denver occupational tax challenged by USPS employees. Court reversed its position in Johnson and overruled it; Court held that the Denver occupational tax was an income tax which could via the Buck Act be imposed on federal employees.

    State v. Pearson Construction Company, 236 Ind. 602, 141 N.E.2d 448 (1957):
    Court held state income tax was applicable to federal enclaves via the Buck Act.

    Davis v. Howard, 306 Ky.149, 206 S.W.2d 467 (1947):
    Challenge to collection of gasoline tax within Camp Campbell on grounds that the enclave was not within state’s jurisdiction. However, Court held that Buck Act permitted the collection of the tax, and was, in essence, a recession of taxing jurisdiction.
    Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

  7. #17
    Senior Member Treefarmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    in the woods known to some as Tanasi
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post

    There are quite a few that suggest that Germany (Japan too!) is still under U.S. occupation to this very day. Would it be true that the "Confederacy" "has been" an enemy of the United States?

    [ Perhaps see also "Trading With the Enemy Act"]



    I was born and raised in Germany and I was always under the impression that Germany was under US occupation.
    Learning English was and is still mandatory for all German school children, even though England is not a popular travel destination. The languages of the countries directly adjoining Germany are not mandatory learning. Even though French is mostly taught as a third language, it is an elective and can be substituted for something else, e.g. Latin. At least that was the case in the schools which I experienced.

    The US military bases were the authority of the land, and they played a prominent role in the economy when I was a child in the late '60s and '70s.
    Culturally, Germany was like the little side-kick of the USA. We got every fashion, music and technology that the US had, but 5 years later in the cities and up to 10 years later in the country, where I grew up.
    My post-baby boomer generation and the younger ones have no genuine German culture. We were completely Anglicized in everything from language to fashion, science, philosophy, entertainment, and even politics.
    This influence did mainly not come from England; with the exception of things like Pink Floyd of course
    Treefarmer

    There is power in the blood of Jesus

  8. #18
    Senior Member Michael Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    peaceful inhabitant on the Earth
    Posts
    1,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Treefarmer View Post
    I was born and raised in Germany and I was always under the impression that Germany was under US occupation.
    Learning English was and is still mandatory for all German school children, even though England is not a popular travel destination. The languages of the countries directly adjoining Germany are not mandatory learning. Even though French is mostly taught as a third language, it is an elective and can be substituted for something else, e.g. Latin. At least that was the case in the schools which I experienced.

    The US military bases were the authority of the land, and they played a prominent role in the economy when I was a child in the late '60s and '70s.
    Culturally, Germany was like the little side-kick of the USA. We got every fashion, music and technology that the US had, but 5 years later in the cities and up to 10 years later in the country, where I grew up.
    My post-baby boomer generation and the younger ones have no genuine German culture. We were completely Anglicized in everything from language to fashion, science, philosophy, entertainment, and even politics.
    This influence did mainly not come from England; with the exception of things like Pink Floyd of course
    I loved going to Germany. Taxi cab drivers are a hoot - making at that time upwards of 100k and all driving Mercedes Benz. but the best is being able to go to any vending machine, put in the appropriate coinage, and getting a cold beer. Now that's living.
    The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

    Lawful Money Trust Website

    Divine Mind Community Call - Sundays 8pm EST

    ONE man or woman can make a difference!

  9. #19
    Senior Member Treefarmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    in the woods known to some as Tanasi
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    I loved going to Germany. Taxi cab drivers are a hoot - making at that time upwards of 100k and all driving Mercedes Benz. but the best is being able to go to any vending machine, put in the appropriate coinage, and getting a cold beer. Now that's living.
    Yeah, when I came over here I was surprised to see candy bars in vending machines instead of cigarettes.

    When I was 18 I drank some beer at a party in Alabama and walked back to my apartment with my bottle of Moosehead in hand. In the parking lot next to the police station I got arrested and those vandal cops poured out my beer!
    I had no idea why they were doing this to me, because I was only doing what I had been taught in German school: if you drink, don't drive 'cause that's dangerous; be a good citizen and walk home.
    I was in total culture shock
    Treefarmer

    There is power in the blood of Jesus

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    That escape from the fealty system escaped some folks because the fact of the Registry remains. - Leaving the question;
    Perhaps not domestic = off-base.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Does the peaceful inhabitant have license plates at all? Without license plates you will be stopped by armed men inquiring about driver license and financial responsibility (insurance). Without insurance, the motor vehicle cannot be licensed or get the plates - so you can be paying an insurance policy but be jailed anyway, upon the cop's legal opinion that your insurance company will not cover you without a license...
    Does the peaceful inhabitant fly the flags of a belligerent during wartime? This is where contract law and notice comes into play. If you are not a belligerent and you're being forced to wear enemy indicia--making the intent known might be quite a good thing to do.

    But then, this is where utilization of a USDOT # or signs like "NOT FOR HIRE" can come handy. However when its to the repugnant extreme that the armed agents of a State arent even competent to tell the difference between belligerents and neutrals--you might have a conspiracy against rights or even sedition on your hands...

    dereliction of duty...
    slavery..
    peonage..

    there are laws against such aint there?
    Last edited by allodial; 06-08-11 at 04:12 AM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •