Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Are we still under military rule? The war that never ended.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    You might find that the trustee's agent offers Charges?

    We do not find peaceful inhabitants left in peace without proper license plates. I know a fellow who lived in peace many years with Kingdom of Israel license plates but then one icy morning two cars slid into his and the Charges began to accrue. [I should inquire how that turned out.]

    On the example offered though;

    One should pay a reasonable amount to the State for the vehicle to be registered as a motor vehicle so that law enforcement officials can determine the name of the man responsible for it upon sighting of the vehicle. That's the nature of the vehicle. It can be used to avoid a conversation/interview and that license plate is the only thing in many cases said by way of an interview.

    I will try to make my point more clearly.

    It logically follows that when one's vehicle is in the registry, one might stop paying the yearly fealty of the property tax. - Just pay to update the information should it change. [Paying in lawful money.]

    I tried doing this - calling for a probable cause hearing when my motorscooter was taken into impound (forfeiture) for allowing the date stickers to expire. Part of that is renewal of registration, I know, but if the Information (Indictment) is unchanged, there is no cost to update nothing... Just leave the Information on me unchanged.

    They took my motorscooter, sold it with the other forfeited vessels at Impound Lot auction and jailed me about not having insurance (bottomry). The results were financial alright. It became a cause for true judgment that instantly closed down the Stock Market for three days.

    http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/992/beijing2.jpg
    http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/2369/beijing3.jpg

    This is what I am talking about. I am not denying that War and Emergency Powers exist in America. Fiat is against the Constitution except for LINCOLN's July 4, 1861 convention of Congress under the Extraordinary Occasion clause and we still have fiat today. My point is more that the difference between Martial Law and Martial Rule in America is that the sanctions of the war are commercial/financial, that infractions result in Charges.

    The Bill of Exchange calls in every debt-note in existence world-wide. It still does. It is the backing for authority for every Libel of Review Default Judgment. Well, the Truth reflected in lawful money anyway. The War is the basis for the current cestui que trust.


    Meaning that my claims, mostly based in my mind at the time about that Ruling, the county judge would only hear my Probable Cause Hearing after I had been fully arraigned were that since I had intentionally quit the property tax payments on the vehicle, that I was the highest holder of any title, outside the State. I was the beneficiary of the trust. I still had the motorscooter in the registry and could be located through that information. The day that I filed the local CAFR into the case with a subpoena for the City Bookkeeper to break-out the Impound Lot as a profit center, they dogged me around with the Police Helicopter!

    This boundary line, the surveyed border of the belligerent, or more accurately the actual theater of war, where the constitutional protections cease; that is what I am speaking about. I was helping my pal across the border just the other day. He needed a certified copy of a case where he finally settled the charges ten years ago. But the border guards wanted a certified copy. So I was putting my recording equipment back in my pockets etc. at the courthouse security checkpoint and they attacked - bracketed - by insisting on a last name. (Attached audio snippet). I do not know, with a $20M lien going - the Security Supervisor made sure to slam my things on the table especially hard. Which actually came off very childish in front of his men. [Some of you may already know that they assign a guard to dog me around whenever I am in the courthouse and on a Monday morning, the Super can hardly afford that kind of waste of manpower.] So they attacked, as you hear, and I countered with the truth - My name is David Merrill. I deleted the part a moment later, you could just barely hear them discussing that I said my name was David Merrill, but it seemed to thwart the attack. I strongly suspect that if I would have said, I do not have a last name, things would have gone differently. I would have been identified an enemy belligerent. Even if I would have issued a legal or full name by giving my family name for a last name, that would have identified me differently.

    It may not be evident on the audio snippet but my sensibilities, and I may be paranoid to some extent, tell me that demanding my last name was an attack, from a para-military officer informed by intelligence that I was among them in what they consider the theater of war, without being among them in spirit of belligerent. I don't have Schroedinger's Cat about to tell me the other timeline, when I bit my tongue on submitting myself by issuing a legal or full name against myself. But as it turned out, I am sure glad I resisted my conditioning. You may not hear it in the guard's voice, but he definitely asked the question with hostility tag-teamed by the Super smacking my bucket of stuff, camera and audio recorder included on the table with abrupt violence.

    The warfare is reflected in this friction between Motla68 and myself too. In every example of a success story he has shown graphically, the success can be attributed to the redemption of lawful money. When compelled to divulge, after a week of prodding, what the verbiage on the coupon redemptions read, he even excluded that clause; and I reacted to that omission by banishing him for ten days. I am glad he still comes around and stirs this issue up because I think there is a lot to learn from this issue - My point being you can redact the entire Lieber Code, in full force and effect today, into commercial terms and anything beyond that will be utilized to label you a patriot nutjob Sovrun Citizen.

    The essence of the BoE that perfected (30 days) judgment on September 11, 2001 is to call in all the debt-based currency in the world. Every bill floating around in circulation, anywhere in the world now was created by a loan - upon usury and fractional lending of the local central bank, based on the US Dollar as the world's reserve currency. The US Note though, Title 31 U.S.C. §5115 cannot be used for a reserve currency. That is something to think about if you want to get my point. We suitors handle US Notes in the form of FRNs. We look, for all intents and purposes like belligerents but our intent - peaceful inhabitant - resides in the Demand for Lawful Money.



    Regards,

    David Merrill.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    We do not find peaceful inhabitants left in peace without proper license plates. I know a fellow who lived in peace many years with Kingdom of Israel license plates but then one icy morning two cars slid into his and the Charges began to accrue. [I should inquire how that turned out.]
    Bonding...risk management. What is 'funny' is that I came across an old "Insurance Agreement"..and it was worded similarly to an indemnity bond.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    One should pay a reasonable amount to the State for the vehicle to be registered as a motor vehicle so that law enforcement officials can determine the name of the man responsible for it upon sighting of the vehicle. That's the nature of the vehicle. It can be used to avoid a conversation/interview and that license plate is the only thing in many cases said by way of an interview.
    Or...USDOT #..preferably not from a 'residential address'.

    This is what I am talking about. I am not denying that War and Emergency Powers exist in America. Fiat is against the Constitution except for LINCOLN's July 4, 1861 convention of Congress under the Extraordinary Occasion clause and we still have fiat today. My point is more that the difference between Martial Law and Martial Rule in America is that the sanctions of the war are commercial/financial, that infractions result in Charges.

    I strongly suspect that if I would have said, I do not have a last name, things would have gone differently. I would have been identified an enemy belligerent. Even if I would have issued a legal or full name by giving my family name for a last name, that would have identified me differently.
    Some would suggest there is more goodness in "I'm unaware of having a last name" vs "I don't have a last name." However when you have armed folks who lack competence to tell the difference between fiction and truth...what good is their testimony? I've seen replies to questions for a last name:

    "Do you need a last name? {OFFICER: YES} OK 'Jones'"

    or

    "Just put down 'Jones'. My name is Paul."

    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    I am glad he still comes around and stirs this issue up because I think there is a lot to learn from this issue - My point being you can redact the entire Lieber Code, in full force and effect today, into commercial terms and anything beyond that will be utilized to label you a patriot nutjob Sovrun Citizen.
    Revenue agents <- prosecution of war (USDOJ--IRS/ATF/DEA/U.S. Navy drug interdiction--all $$$$$$$ related). I suppose one could even denominate a payment in United States notes rather than just $ or "U.S. Dollars".

    If you somehow lawful money should always be rendered as being 'principal' and scrip/FRNs/"Federation credits" likewise as interest--if there isn't interest involved--how can there be profit, commerce, tax or revenue-collecting?

    ***

    If it pertains to interest/revenue/commerce then...well there are some pretty clearly defined principles or concepts of "international law" relating to belligerents and commerce. However, it might be that private creditors are not regarded as belligerents in any case.

    ***

    And on that note... Laws of Land Warfare / "Hague Regulations" prohibit forced allegiance. By forcing you into a position suretyship for a legal entity that is intrinsically allegiant ...its a treaty violation..and likely punishable by court martial.

    Art. 45.

    It is forbidden to compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to swear allegiance to the hostile Power.
    [ See also 18 USC 241 ]
    Last edited by allodial; 06-08-11 at 09:52 PM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
    Bonding...risk management. What is 'funny' is that I came across an old "Insurance Agreement"..and it was worded similarly to an indemnity bond.



    Or...USDOT #..preferably not from a 'residential address'.



    Some would suggest there is more goodness in "I'm unaware of having a last name" vs "I don't have a last name." However when you have armed folks who lack competence to tell the difference between fiction and truth...what good is their testimony? I've seen replies to questions for a last name:

    "Do you need a last name? {OFFICER: YES} OK 'Jones'"

    or

    "Just put down 'Jones'. My name is Paul."



    Revenue agents <- prosecution of war (USDOJ--IRS/ATF/DEA/U.S. Navy drug interdiction--all $$$$$$$ related). I suppose one could even denominate a payment in United States notes rather than just $ or "U.S. Dollars".

    If you somehow lawful money should always be rendered as being 'principal' and scrip/FRNs/"Federation credits" likewise as interest--if there isn't interest involved--how can there be profit, commerce, tax or revenue-collecting?

    ***

    If it pertains to interest/revenue/commerce then...well there are some pretty clearly defined principles or concepts of "international law" relating to belligerents and commerce. However, it might be that private creditors are not regarded as belligerents in any case.

    ***

    And on that note... Laws of Land Warfare / "Hague Regulations" prohibit forced allegiance. By forcing you into a position suretyship for a legal entity that is intrinsically allegiant ...its a treaty violation..and likely punishable by court martial.



    [ See also 18 USC 241 ]

    Yes. Forgery.

    You may have brought up the interest though - afresh. That may be new here at StSC.

    Look at Deuteronomy 15:1-3 and at 23:20 both using nakar, from Noach (Noah).


    Under full acceptance of the Lieber Code then, (Motla68's apparent posture) the mailman is a field scout for the Navy serving - US Postal Service - process and noting proof of service; empty mailbox the next day (through the little enclave) for the President as Executive Commander-in-Chief.

    Ergo the Libel of Review; see the instructions at the end. Most of the lesson plan is to teach the new suitors how to run court on that mailbox rather than the other way around. Looking at the whole thing, it is challenging the federal judge to admit it - we become resident Noachides through that little federal enclave out front. There is no accusation that they did not file in the USDC - they have been doing it all our lives - the USDC is right there in that little enclave - the mailbox!

    Being presumed Noachides, we are the foreigner and stranger in the Bible subject to that kind of usury - interest. Of course we can make our demand for lawful money known on the record and defeat the presumption.



    Regards,

    David Merrill.

  4. #4
    If a DL expires what has been expunged ITS date ITS driver ITS privilege ITS person ITS NAME ITS COMMERCE what has expired has passed, dead in law bringing a living Man to re-venue re-new your D-L OR BEGGING ANEW DEAD AND LOVING IT MEL BROOKS WORK WORK WORK CONTRACTS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •