Results 1 to 10 of 56

Thread: Citizen Sues Atlanta Fed

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Thank you! In your studies and experience do you understand how Scott might be trying to apply the doctrine?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Trust Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seated : County of Madison
    Posts
    152
    I was unaware he was claiming PAG status. Wouldn’t have surmised that from his filings. Am also unaware of PAG specifics within the Venue of his suit .

    One may declare PAG status in investigation / prosecution of matters pertaining to the ( so called ) “Public Good” . Most often applied in matters classified , “of Civil Rights” . Less often in matters of mis / malfeasance of Office or Appointment .

    Our efforts in Orange County California were pursued by Citizens , Ex Rel : County of Orange . The Investigative Grand Jury was presided over by a “Justice” voted by the group , and assisted by someone requested to take the mantel of PAG .

    Other cases I’ve seen were pursued by individuals via Qui tam action .
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In reflecting momentarily , he might be holding the claim in reserve as defense against a Nuisance suit for damages . Having PAG Status recognized in court would provide protection as a Government Witness. Unless he originally brought this matter up for investigation by some "Authority" , and was rebuffed , I'm not sure how this strategy would properly apply either .
    Last edited by Trust Guy; 06-25-11 at 01:40 AM. Reason: add reflection
    Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •