Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Prosecutions WITHOUT an Actual Injured Party are a SHAM

  1. #21
    Let's see the oath of the supreme court judge swore in Dan MAY?



    That is not exactly what you are after but maybe if I look in my Oaths directory I can put something together... Nope! The only affirmation I have is old and from administered by the old chief judge. I don't have his oath.

    The way I am understanding it, by all research at this point, any affirmation must be deferring to a judge who has been sworn in by swearing. That allows for your hypothesis but does not confirm it.

  2. #22
    P.S. Hey!!

    I just looked at that Oath of Office. He signed before a Notary. Fine. But the other day I learned about Notaries administering oaths! See how that agrees with Colorado Statute?






    It looks like the Notary has mis-administered. Dan MAY was allowed to swear but not by any Witness - the ever-living God.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •