That's great to hear.
27 years for me.
That's great to hear.
27 years for me.
And what method, or combination of methods, have fueled your success, if I may ask?Originally Posted by walter
I've only been redeeming for the last month or so, myself, and find it thrilling. I find it odd that none of the BofA tellers have even noticed my non-endorsement. In fact, it makes me nervous every time I cash a check, just waiting to get that stink-eye! I scanned my signature and included with it the RILM verbiage, using MS Word, and just print that on the back of my checks, in lieu of a stamp.
I'm planning to start working on my libel of review very soon but am a bit overwhelmed with that one so I'm sure I will be posting here begging for help! I really can't wait to see the results of my filing with redeemed deduction included!
The easiest one of them all. I hid.
When I finished college I had a student loan and had no job.
So I moved to a party ski hill town and had fun.
I only filed tax's when in school for two years, because of the loan you had to, and I never filed an income.
When I had a job in party town for 5 years I received the T4 slips from the employer just like everyone else.
The only difference I did was I did not file.
The CRA owned me monies from the employer taking tax's off the pay cheque, but I did not want the loans department to find me.
So I said to myself that the CRA can keep those few bucks because the headache of dealing with the student loans department at the time was not worth it for me in life.
That is what slowly drove me underground. I started to live life with out them being involved.
Made working decisions based on staying out of their eyes.
And started to work for myself.
The student loan vanished with out paying one cent, and the CRA has no claim on me.
I just never filed an income. Ever.
I did a subdivision with a couple co-owners.
Government rezoning, dealing with many government departments etc.
The co-owners gave their info to the tax man and I didn't.
They are having problems with the taxman extorting monies and I get left alone.
I told them not to do it that way but they did it anyway.
Now they are paying the price.
I had a money broker once do a NAME search on my NAME because he said everyone was in the system.
Well guess what he found out?
I am not in the system.
It was the first time he found nothing on a NAME.
What we do as kids when we first start to work for a pay cheque in life starts the ball rolling for the taxman.
We want to be grown adults so bad that we jump right into the rat-race with out ever thinking twice about what we are doing.
So it comes down to how can they hold you to a number when you never used the number?
Walter, that is an amazing story. Thank you for sharing. Would that all of us could have seen so clearly at such a young age.
So what exactly does a RLM tax return look like? (for those who file them). How is it made clear that the funds in question are indeed "Lawful Money"?
Darkmagus,
I will bite, even though I can't speak from direct experience of this, yet (eagerly awaiting tax season to file my first such return after redeeming half of this years paychecks!).
The surest proof of redemption, as I understand it, is the copies of the front and back of your non-endorsed checks that you will include with your return.
This, to me, is elegant simplicity.
There are a couple of examples of proper, though sanitized, returns with redemption schedules floating around this site, if you look around a bit.
Last edited by Robert Henry; 08-02-13 at 07:24 PM.
I thought I would share an expansive pdf file on the use of "Includes/Including". Take a look, it's been very helpful for me.
Darkmagus
American rule of law, read the brief here, the government's response here and the reply to that response here.
I have just entered my 8th year as a successful NONTAXPAYER! No wage garnishments, no liens, no levies, no penalties, no CP letters.
http://ctcwarrior.com/SSA_2015_3.jpg
I come before you tonight humbled by this win. It would not have been possible without the work of other freedom-fighters who came before me and published their work. Thank you David, Pete, Rick and all [including the quatlosers offering a token of their affliction] who've helped me achieve such an unprecedented victory.
Thank you very much. God bless, and go Patriots!
PS. I did not rebut the 1099-MISC amounts I received for 2012 or 2013. I simply did not include those amounts on a Form 1040 since it was redeemed lawful money and there was no obligation.
http://jesse2012.com/my109912.jpg
http://jesse2012.com/my109913.jpg
Last edited by JohnnyCash; 01-02-15 at 03:56 PM.
Congrats!
One thing stands out though...
It appears that your Social Security & Medicare benefits will be greatly reduced by your "0" earnings. That makes sense if you not are wanting SSA & Medicare Benefits.
My SSA report for my past 3 successful lawful money demand tax years shows my full amount of earnings (in FRNs) credited for SSA, so it will yearly increase my SSA benefits for Retirement & Medicare, which I am paying withholding for and plan to use at age 66, and will also continue to redeem its FRNs transacted thereby. (Contact me privately about how I use TaxAct for this.)
So we are doing our 1040's very differently, and yet it appears that your previously-made point that the IRS won't touch any 1040 that has a lawful money demand reduction on it is certainly true! That's great! They don't want any "press" on it in the courts or news.
Like in the movie "National Treasure"... when the father warned about "keeping the status quo" in order to preserve their lives with their captors. This complies with Mt 13:30 - "let both grow together..." which appears to be the rule the system is honoring... because they know what happens if they don't.
Last edited by doug555; 01-02-15 at 09:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
