To avoid hearsay in a court of law not only will they want to see a signed
certified and sealed document they will also need to speak with the person/
man whom gave that authority to administrate an account they created.

I keep asking lower and upper echelons who is the qualified/authorized
trustee as some of you have. The lower says go to upper, but you talk
to upper and they are remaining silent on the issue.
The only evidence found is within federal court case documents of
every court case it says the U.S. District attorney's office is the trustee
for the United States, but this is a huge office, a friend told me he got
a reply back once that said each office worker in that office is assigned
to only answer specific questions, not it is just a matter of finding the
correct person to as the right questions to.

A little further thought on this, are you a natural resource, are you part of the
land i.e. connected directly to it?
The Trustees have a responsibility to protect natural resources.. light bulb!
Source: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/33/40/I/2706

With a military occupation in place do you feel as if they are attempting to
control you? Could it be they have a trust in us, but we do not have trust
with them? Where does their authority come from? Lets investigate -->>

natural law
n.
A law or body of laws that derives from nature and is believed to be binding
upon human actions apart from or in conjunction with laws established by
human authority.
1. (Philosophy) an ethical belief or system of beliefs supposed to be inherent in
human nature and discoverable by reason rather than revelation
3. (Philosophy) the philosophical doctrine that the authority of the legal
system or of certain laws derives from their justifiability by reason, and indeed
that a legal system which cannot be so justified has no authority
Source: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/natural+law

Does one man have authority over another if there is not meeting of the minds,
is one man's belief another man's contract? NO, not without consent!
a couple more definitions here to discover what seals the deal.
quasi natural
2 a : existing as part of or determined by nature natural condition of the land> b :
being in accordance with or arising from nature esp. as distinguished from operation
of law —see also NATURAL PERSON —compare ARTIFICIAL c : arising from the
usual course of events natural result of the accident>
4 : ILLEGITIMATE natural child> —nat·u·ral·ly adverb

Silence is acquiescence, you have to speak up about not consenting to be that
piece of paper, President Bush even said it is "nothing but a Damn piece of paper".
....

Moving on to the contract part of this where a babies foot print was forced on to
a piece of paper, a survey event upon the land, just as deaths and divorces are.

Quasi-contractus
A term used in the civil law. A quasi-contract is the act of a person, permitted by law,
by which he obligates himself towards another, or by which another binds himself to
him, without any agreement between them.
2. By article 2272 of the Civil Code of Louisiana, which is translated from article 1371
of the Code Civil, quasi-contracts are defined to be "the lawful and purely voluntary acts of a man, from which there results any obligation whatever to a third person, and sometime a reciprocal obligation between the parties." In contracts, it is the consent of the contracting parties which produces the obligation; in quasi-contracts no consent is required, and the obligation arises from the law or natural equity, on the facts of the case. These acts are called quasi-contracts, because, without being contracts, they bind the parties as contracts do.

5.-2. Tutorship or guardianship, is the second kind of quasi- contracts, there being no
agreement between the tutor and minor.

11. There is no term in the common law which answers to that of quasi- contract; many
quasi-contracts may doubtless be classed among implied contracts; there is, however,
a difference between them, which an example will make manifest. In case money should
be paid by mistake to a minor, it may be recovered from him by the civil law, because his
consent is not necessary to a quasi-contract but by the common law, if it can be recovered, it must be upon an agreement to which the law presumes he has consented, and it is doubtful, upon principle, whether such recovery could be had.

Is a policy from IRS for Voluntary Compliance enough to establish a common law contract or is it the actions of a human acting in quasi/persona that does this?

Who gave us the authority to administrator act as trustee for the strawman/persona account, can you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt?