Currently being denied my deposit with demand to redeem lawful money

[Robert Henry]

All,

D555 is only pointing out a possible flaw in the logic behind 'Redeemed' (past tense) and the present tense 'Demand' for Lawful Money, AND, relative to legal/law. You MUST look at all the possibilities these evil 'lords' will utilize to bring us down. It is THEIR JOB to do so. How can you (and this includes you, JC) KNOW FOR CERTAIN that they will NEVER come after you? What if suddenly there is a directive at IRS to, 'hunt down any flaws in the RILM execution'? So you MIGHT be ok if you made some sort of Public Demand of your INTENT via an Affidavit at the County, and then 'redeemed' (past tense) those checks after such Demand was made public. However, if there was no Public Demand and you are executing a presumed 'past tense' operation (redeemed), can you be 100% sure that you are in the clear? These 'people' are ruthless monsters, and I know that more so than the average Joe.

The warning is a valid one, regardless of whether any of us ever become subject to any wrath as a result. It's simple logic, that's all. Why can't everyone see it that way? I don't think D555 has a 'troll' agenda. 'Just think about it' is what I think he is saying.

Perhaps I should further clarify as well, as it seems people may be inclined to jump in the water before first dipping a toe to test the temperature - not wise, in my opinion.

Do your homework on this process and fully comprehend the possible ramifications. I cannot stress enough the importance of the intrepid suitor having guidance and I would strongly recommend that people talk with David Merrill directly.

There is more to this than simply publishing something at the county, if you wish to provide overwhelming evidence and clearly demonstrate your intent.

For at least the third time in this thread I will advise that properly serving, posting and publishing your Notice and Demand for Lawful Money is critical. I would not proceed with IRS filings without having done such.