A regular deposit of lawful money.

[David Merrill]

Cool! Then the fellow who refused to accept one (article) turned away a valuable collector coin?


Thanks!!



What I was talking about though - if you find the banker in violation of law you might consider application of this Form. I have not acquired any direct (suitor) experience with this except one district court magistrate voiced an order...

Looking carefully though; Document #113? This is a slush case for documents that fail to be clear which case they are to be filed in. The magistrate is coercing the use of that file category for one thing. Another thing is that it does not specify on the Form that this form is only for federal prosecutors to use.

Time will tell us though, as we are in process of testing the form. It looks like anybody can take responsibility in front of a federal judge and any judge (not magistrate) denying that right, to be a private attorney general at the least, would be in violation of right. The main support for this is that the magistrate fails to cite any statute or code to support the assertion. Additionally magistrates cannot make dispository decisions and this is definitely a criminal case disposition. Only a judge can make this kind of decision but magistrates can make a decision like the one coerced here; to return a document that is unclear about which case it is to be filed in. However the Criminal Complaint was quite clear about the Case #.



Regards,

David Merrill.