Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
you make a very good point. Effectively the BC is evidence that the BC has been DE-Livered to someone; and, that someone has yet to come forth with a claim. And in the stead of a claim, that one has handled the BC such that the BC was "used" to obtain DL, SSN, etc. It is like this: "This card is property of the "insert name"; if you find this card and it does not belong to you, then return it to "the one who issued the card = Grantor". Now, if one who does not own Uses the Card then that one is now with the Liability of the Card.

A Certificate of Trust is not to be used to usurp the Trustee. It is to be evidence to the Trustee of the Beneficial Interest Holder. Therefore the Legal Title and the Estate belong to the Trustee, as Owner but the Equitable Title is in the Beneficiary. But in fact the Beneficiary has been asleep, in ignorance.

Now, then I am a proponent of "chain of command". As such, starting at County, then State, then Federal. And the more that I think about this matter the more I tend to lean towards the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Eventually, I believe the claim must arrive at its steps. But only AFTER chain of command is followed.

Hey wait a minute. Are you saying you want to acknowledge the BC or the COLB? No way to acknowledge the COLB as you are the Grantor/Beneficiary. The BC too does not need acknowledging as it is just a certificate of Trust. Issued by the Trustee to the Beneficiary. So that the Trustee knows who the Beneficiary is for record keeping purposes.

Just try to get the Original COLB Back. No way in Hell is that going to happen. So then you get the next best thing. A Certified Copy from the Trustee of the Original.

Why take an Oath and put yourself under a Curse. Else obey Scripture. Do all things in my name, Yehoshuah. For the children of the King are Free.




shalom,
mj
You say the COLB or BC need not be acknowledged by the Beneficiary. You also state that the Beneficiary is also Grantor. This has me confused a bit. My thought was that my Dad was Grantor and I am the Grantee. These (COLBs, BCs) are DEEDs after all, aren't they? If so, the grantee must accept and acknowledge the grant in order for there to be EXECUTION. Absent that act, the DEED is defective since the original intent is not fulfilled. It lies abandoned and in limbo/escrow until such time as the proper claim is made - EXECUTION.

Perhaps you mean that we are GRANTOR only when we continue to stay asleep and ignorant. Since it is only we that could "offer up" said estate in complete ignorance, albeit lawfully, we unwittingly GRANT or transfer our right of inheritance to the appointed wards/guardians of the landed estate intended as our inheritance. We should have just come forth and EXECUTED the DEED and became owners/heirs of the property of said landed estate by the original intent. Instead, we granted it away and the UNEXECUTED defective DEED is claimed by the STATE by our own doing.

Or perhaps you mean we should GRANT the estate, once we EXECUTE the original DEED, to the STATE in LEGAL Title only as Trustee so that we retain equitable title and DOMINION absent the obligation or liability to perform under, or be subject to, the countless bylaws (codes, statutes, ordinances, etc.) of LEGAL titleship.

We exist and use at arm's length and enjoy the DOMINION we were Granted by Almighty God Himself.