LAW states registration not required

[motla68]

You'll have to dig deeper than this cursory presentation given.

How about you cough up some history or treatises on registries and registration?

If you think something is needed done then do it, otherwise you have not convinced me I need to dig deeper, and do it without quoting the informer or some other so called patriot guru, go to the statutes at large or some other positive law that specifically validates your claim, use dictionary terms e.t.c., give it some solid backing.

[shikamaru]

If you think something is needed done then do it, otherwise you have not convinced me I need to dig deeper, and do it without quoting the informer or some other so called patriot guru, go to the statutes at large or some other positive law that specifically validates your claim, use dictionary terms e.t.c., give it some solid backing.

No.... You do it. You like to skim and give half stories without doing serious research such as your half-cocked lien theory on mortgages.

What about title theory states?

Or...will any BS from you do?

[motla68]

No.... You do it. You like to skim and give half stories without during serious research such as your half-cocked lien theory on mortgages.

What about title theory states?

Or...will any BS from you do?

I gave you the keys (reference to cites), but not going to open the door for you. There is no silver platter here, time to man up.

[shikamaru]

I gave you the keys (reference to cites), but not going to open the door for you. There is no silver platter here, time to man up.

No you didn't. Keep copping out.
Perhaps you need to learn how to research.
If you do that, your theories won't be half baked.

Again, what about title theory states versus lien theory states?
Can you answer or do I have to show you how real research is done, son?

[motla68]

No you didn't. Keep copping out.
Perhaps you need to learn how to research.
If you do that, your theories won't be half baked.

Again, what about title theory states versus lien theory states?
Can you answer or do I have to show you how real research is done, son?

You seem to be expecting a lot more from me then what you are willing to do yourself, for that I cannot help you.
Also you boast as if you allegedly already have your own answer, so why ask the question ?

You win, this ego is checking out.

[shikamaru]

You seem to be expecting a lot more from me then what you are willing to do yourself, for that I cannot help you.
Also you boast as if you allegedly already have your own answer, so why ask the question ?

You win, this ego is checking out.

Don't run, son.
You are about to receive a lesson on how to research.

You never answer a single question nor can you produce any resources.
Time for me to show you how it's done.

Again, what about title theory states versus lien theory states with respect to mortgages?
I'll give you some time before I unload on you.

[motla68]

Don't run, son.
You are about to receive a lesson on how to research.

You never answer a single question nor can you produce any resources.
Time for me to show you how it's done.

Again, what about title theory states versus lien theory states with respect to mortgages?
I'll give you some time before I unload on you.

I have my own method of research which fairs me pretty well, no thank you.

You missed it the first time and the second time, here it is again:

697.02 Nature of a mortgage.—A mortgage shall be held to be a specific lien on the property therein described, and not a conveyance of the legal title or of the right of possession.
History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 525, 1853; RS 1982; GS 2495; RGS 3837; CGL 5725.

Florida statutes, go look and prove me wrong if you think I am fabricating it.

Unload on me? have you ever stopped unloading on me?
I was just here asked of a friend to share some information, i did not expect the treatment i got here. You have posted so many things of hearsay in here and have given even a lot less then I have, you claim you know something just because someone else said it and you call that research, no thank you.