Originally Posted by
Michael Joseph
you make a very good point. Effectively the BC is evidence that the BC has been DE-Livered to someone; and, that someone has yet to come forth with a claim. And in the stead of a claim, that one has handled the BC such that the BC was "used" to obtain DL, SSN, etc. It is like this: "This card is property of the "insert name"; if you find this card and it does not belong to you, then return it to "the one who issued the card = Grantor". Now, if one who does not own Uses the Card then that one is now with the Liability of the Card.
A Certificate of Trust is not to be used to usurp the Trustee. It is to be evidence to the Trustee of the Beneficial Interest Holder. Therefore the Legal Title and the Estate belong to the Trustee, as Owner but the Equitable Title is in the Beneficiary. But in fact the Beneficiary has been asleep, in ignorance.
Now, then I am a proponent of "chain of command". As such, starting at County, then State, then Federal. And the more that I think about this matter the more I tend to lean towards the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Eventually, I believe the claim must arrive at its steps. But only AFTER chain of command is followed.
Hey wait a minute. Are you saying you want to acknowledge the BC or the COLB? No way to acknowledge the COLB as you are the Grantor/Beneficiary. The BC too does not need acknowledging as it is just a certificate of Trust. Issued by the Trustee to the Beneficiary. So that the Trustee knows who the Beneficiary is for record keeping purposes.
Just try to get the Original COLB Back. No way in Hell is that going to happen. So then you get the next best thing. A Certified Copy from the Trustee of the Original.
Why take an Oath and put yourself under a Curse. Else obey Scripture. Do all things in my name, Yehoshuah. For the children of the King are Free.
shalom,
mj