LAW states registration not required

[Treefarmer]

Consider a possibility of Two Trust formations within the NAME of INHERITANCE = Surname. Does not the Male Son in inherit in his Father's Name? Specifically, the wife does not keep her Father's Name but assumes her Husband's name. Therefore the inheritance is in the Father's Name. It is the Father who Granted the Certificate of Live Birth. It was the Father, overshadowing the Son who ALLOWED the Son's fingerprints/footprints and perhaps blood sample, to be placed upon said Certificate.

To whom was said Certificate made the LIVERY upon? Was it not an OFFICE OF STATE? Is the office of Doctor Alien to the State? What then of the Heir? Where is the Heir? The Estate has been transferred into Trust for the benefit of the Heir! So again, where is the Heir? The State has EVERY right to hear any matter concerning the NAME of INHERITANCE as the State has the Legal Title. But the Heir has the Equitable Title! So again, for the third time, where is the Heir? Is the Heir DEAD? Is this not a valid presumption? Else, where is the Heir?

Now a Certificate of Beneficial Interest issues from the Trustee back upon the Grantor [Birth Certificate].

Why would the Heir UNDERTAKE by USING said Certificate of Beneficial Interest as an ID to obtain Driver's License, SSN, etc? See now a man Undertaking for the Grantor [State]? Tell me again, gainsayers: Who issues the Driver's License? Is it not the State, as Grantor? Then, who then is the Trustee?

In the former scenario, the State as Trustee, with the Legal Title and the man, as Administrator/Beneficiary with the Equitable Title.

In the latter scenario, the man as Trustee with the Legal Title [SUBJECT to EVERY statute made within the Trust Bylaws] and the Administration/Beneficiary in the State.

Maybe now you better comprehend why the Attorneys speak of TAXPAYER ENTITLEMENTS.


-------------------------------

This is the Technology of Balaam - Numbers 24-26. Israel must VOLUNTARILY bring a curse upon himself.

If you think me wrong, then show me why in LOGIC.

Which is the former and which is the latter scenario in your post?
Would you point them out or highlight them please?
Thank you!

[Michael Joseph]

Which is the former and which is the latter scenario in your post?
Would you point them out or highlight them please?
Thank you!

1ST SCENARIO:

Consider a possibility of Two Trust formations within the NAME of INHERITANCE = Surname. Does not the Male Son in inherit in his Father's Name? Specifically, the wife does not keep her Father's Name but assumes her Husband's name. Therefore the inheritance is in the Father's Name. It is the Father who Granted the Certificate of Live Birth. It was the Father, overshadowing the Son who ALLOWED the Son's fingerprints/footprints and perhaps blood sample, to be placed upon said Certificate.

To whom was said Certificate made the LIVERY upon? Was it not an OFFICE OF STATE? Is the office of Doctor Alien to the State? What then of the Heir? Where is the Heir? The Estate has been transferred into Trust for the benefit of the Heir! So again, where is the Heir? The State has EVERY right to hear any matter concerning the NAME of INHERITANCE as the State has the Legal Title. But the Heir has the Equitable Title! So again, for the third time, where is the Heir? Is the Heir DEAD? Is this not a valid presumption? Else, where is the Heir?

Now a Certificate of Beneficial Interest issues from the Trustee back upon the Grantor [Birth Certificate].

2ND SCENARIO:

Why would the Heir UNDERTAKE by USING said Certificate of Beneficial Interest as an ID to obtain Driver's License, SSN, etc? See now a man Undertaking for the Grantor [State]? Tell me again, gainsayers: Who issues the Driver's License? Is it not the State, as Grantor? Then, who then is the Trustee?

In the former scenario, the State as Trustee, with the Legal Title and the man, as Administrator/Beneficiary with the Equitable Title.

In the latter scenario, the man as Trustee with the Legal Title [SUBJECT to EVERY statute made within the Trust Bylaws] and the Administration/Beneficiary in the State.

Maybe now you better comprehend why the Attorneys speak of TAXPAYER ENTITLEMENTS.


-------------------------------

Treefarmer: If you comprehend in Scenario 1 who is the Grantor? In Scenario 2: Who is the Grantor? Rhetorical Questions of course, but nevertheless in former (1st Scenario) : Man. In latter (2nd Scenario) :State.

[Treefarmer]

Thank you Michael Joseph, this explanation greatly aided my comprehension.

The answer to the question in the 2ND SCENARIO, "Why would the Heir UNDERTAKE by USING said Certificate of Beneficial Interest as an ID to obtain Driver's License, SSN, etc?" is easy: because the Heir was told to do so by parents, family members, teachers, elders, etc. The Heir was made to understand that bucking up against this system is equal to being a rebel, a villain, and an outlaw.

The answer to the question in the 1ST SCENARIO, "Where is the Heir?" is much more elusive. I would like to know the answer, because the UNDERTAKING business has never really worked out well for me.

Who can explain where the Heir is in the 1ST SCENARIO?

[Michael Joseph]

The answer to the question in the 1ST SCENARIO, "Where is the Heir?" is much more elusive. I would like to know the answer, because the UNDERTAKING business has never really worked out well for me.

Who can explain where the Heir is in the 1ST SCENARIO?

Look in the mirror maybe you will then comprehend.

Of course the answers are so obvious as to not need answering. I do not concern myself with the 2nd Scenario. Knowing those things are a waste of my time. I am interested in what I can control. I lack the time or the interest to learn the bylaws and take an oath.

The Trust already exists. Why would I undertake to become trustee? I highly recommend watching the movie CLEOPATRA version 1963, the entire movie, but see the following starting at minute mark 4:15.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSH0x...eature=related


The Queen adequately states "I know who you are, WHAT ARE YOU, at the moment?"

A supplicant is of course one who requests. Therefore a supplicant begs a benefit from a Grantor.