Constitutional Citizens vs. statutory Citizens-it makes a difference

[Frederick Burrell]

This is an interesting perspective on the citizen ship issue that I had not seen before. Enjoy


1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this document is to establish with evidence the following facts:
1. That deception is often times caused by abuse, misuse, and purposeful misapplication of “words of art” and failing to distinguish the context in which such words are used on government forms and in legal proceedings.
2. That there are two different jurisdictions and contexts in which the word “citizen” can be applied: statutory v. constitutional.
2.1. “Constitutional citizen” is a POLITICAL status tied to:
2.1.1. “nationality”
2.1.2. The U.S. Constitution.
2.1.3. POLITICAL jurisdiction and a specific political status.
2.1.4. A “nation” under the law of nations.
2.1.5. Membership in a “nation” under the law of nations and nothing more.

2.2. “Statutory citizen” is a LEGAL status tied to:
2.2.1. “domicile” somewhere WITHIN the nation.
2.2.2. Statutory civil law. That law is described as a “social compact” and private law that only attaches to those with a civil domicile within a specific venue or jurisdiction.
2.2.3. Civil LEGAL jurisdiction and legal status. The status acquired is under statutory civil law and is called “citizen”, “inhabitant”, or “subject”.
2.2.4. A SPECIFIC municipal government among MANY WITHIN a single nation.
2.3. The differences between these two statuses are explained in the following definition: "Nationality. That quality or character which arises from the fact of a person's belonging to a nation or state. Nationality determines the political status of the individual, especially with reference to allegiance; while domicile determines his civil status. Nationality arises either by birth or by naturalization. See also
Naturalization." [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1025]
3. That corrupt governments and public servants intent on breaking down the separation of powers between states of the Union and the federal government purposefully try to exploit legal ignorance of the average American to deceive
constitutional citizens through willful abuse of “words of art” into falsely declaring themselves as statutory citizens on government forms and in legal pleadings. This causes a surrender of all constitutional rights and operates to their extreme detriment by creating lifetime indentured financial servitude and surety in relation to the government. This occurs because a statutory citizen maintains a domicile on federal territory, and the Bill of Rights does not apply on federal territory. “Indeed, the practical interpretation put by Congress upon the Constitution has been long continued and uniform to the effect [182 U.S. 244, 279] that the Constitution is applicable to territories acquired by purchase or conquest, only when and so far as Congress shall so direct. Notwithstanding its duty to 'guarantee to every state in this Union a republican form of government' (art. 4, 4), by which we understand, according to the definition of Webster, 'a government in which the supreme power resides in the whole body of the people, and is exercised by representatives elected by them,' Congress did not hesitate, in the original organization of
39 the territories of Louisiana, Florida, the Northwest Territory, and its subdivisions of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, and Wisconsin and still more recently in the case of Alaska, to establish a form of government bearing a much greater analogy to a British Crown colony than a republican state of America, and to vest the legislative power either in a governor and council, or a governor and judges, to be appointed by the President. It was not until they had attained a certain population that power was given them to organize a legislature by vote of the people. In all these cases, as well as in territories subsequently organized west of the
Mississippi, Congress thought it necessary either to extend to Constitution and laws of the United States over them, or to declare that the inhabitants should be entitled to enjoy the right of trial by jury, of bail, and of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, as well as other privileges of the bill of rights.” [Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)]
4. That once you falsely or improperly declare your status as that of statutory citizen, you are also declaring your domicile to be within the District of Columbia pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(39) and 26 U.S.C. §7408(d).
5. That 8 U.S.C. §1401 defines a statutory “national and citizen of the United States”, where “United States” means the federal zone and excludes states of the Union. Even if they mention the 50 states in the definition of “United States”,
Why You Are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory Citizen
Copyright Family Guardian Fellowship,

More at link http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawA...yANational.pdf

fB