Originally Posted by
David Merrill
Two different subjects?
The first is from the 1629 Charter.
The second if I may presume is from Dr Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire's interpretation of the Journals of the Continental Congress. If he is correct, and I believe a doctor in the law may well be, then you may be correctly interpreting that the nation was never formed by quorum a proper body politic but is rather a trust formed by New Utrecht - named New York after the British Indies Trading Company came into presences in the 1680's?