Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Presumed Dead

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Joseph View Post
    I do believe however that he is missing the boat on redeeming lawful money as remedy. He does dig up many law definitions and citations much like a member on the old sui juris forum named after a dog; "law hound", "law puppy" something like that, and he always highlighted in the same way with either bold blue or red type. He was a good resource for digging up info.
    That's LawDog (Statutepuppy).

    I gave him the name Statutepuppy . He goes all the way back to SJ1.

  2. #22
    Anthony Joseph
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by shikamaru View Post
    That's LawDog (Statutepuppy).

    I gave him the name Statutepuppy . He goes all the way back to SJ1.
    I remember "LawDog" as an antogonist of the Quatloos ilk. The member I was speaking of usually "dug up" many law citations and definitions regarding the conversation going on within the thread. This member was a great resource as he/she wasn't involved in any antogonistic or disruptive tactics at the Sui Juris site.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Joseph View Post
    I remember "LawDog" as an antogonist of the Quatloos ilk. The member I was speaking of usually "dug up" many law citations and definitions regarding the conversation going on within the thread. This member was a great resource as he/she wasn't involved in any antogonistic or disruptive tactics at the Sui Juris site.
    Must be someone else. Statutepuppy is quite rude and antagonistic.

  4. #24
    We, the people are the trust. We always have been. Our lifeblood fuels the planet. Need more proof?

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopica03.pdf



    http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/SCC/3/22


    http://books.google.com/books?id=c9o...0trust&f=false


    http://books.google.com/books?id=dN9...page&q&f=false

    http://books.google.com/books?id=Ohw...ust%22&f=false

    http://supreme.justia.com/cases/fede.../540/case.html

    ". . . (E)very taxpayer is a cestui que trust having sufficient interest in the preventing abuse of the trust to be recognized in the field of this court's prerogative jurisdiction . . . " In Re Bolens (1912), 135 N.W. 164.

    http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfr...3786.NY.htm/qx

    http://www.fredfranke.com/site-map/37#1A3

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...S.172.601.html

    http://books.google.com/books?id=LzY...0trust&f=false

    http://www.supremecourt.ne.gov/profe...douglas.p1.pdf

    http://buttecountyassembly.org/docum...4_edit_001.pdf

    http://supreme.justia.com/cases/fede.../323/case.html

    http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/...98/435/202985/

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...435.10683.html

    http://books.google.com/books?id=8Rk...0trust&f=false

    http://www.rothenberglegal.com/index...&id=1&Itemid=3

    http://www.insitelawmagazine.com/equ...pesoftrust.htm

    http://goldwaterinstitute.org/sites/...ning%20PDF.pdf

    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bi...=203&invol=323

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...S.532.202.html "It is said that as the revenue laws treat the trustee and the beneficiary as distinct tax-paying entities, a court of equity must shut its eyes to the fact that in the realm of reality it was the beneficiary's money which paid the tax and it is her money which the petitioners ask the government to return. Formerly, trustee and cestui que trust were likewise distinct in the eyes of the law, as they are today for many purposes. But whenever the trustee brings suit in a court which is free to consider equitable rights and duties, his right to maintain the suit may be enlarged or diminished by reference to the fact that the suit, though maintained in the name of the trustee alone, is for the benefit and in the equitable interest of the cestui."

    http://www.fredfranke.com/site-map/37#1A3

    http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/...&context=wlulr

    http://www.mckeescholars.org/McKeeCase.pdf

    http://books.google.com/books?id=lDI...0trust&f=false

    http://floridacleanwaternetwork.org/...supreme-court/ (someone is being proactive)

    http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA267550

    http://books.google.com/books?id=NlP...0trust&f=false

    http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/303/376/

    http://statutes.laws.com/alabama/Tit...pter10/40-10-4

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...S.540.285.html

    http://books.google.com/books?id=Tm6...0trust&f=false

    http://books.google.com/books?id=YqE...0trust&f=false

    http://www.repository.law.indiana.ed...12&context=ilj

    http://www.stcl.edu/faculty_pages/fa...&R-Block.1.PDF

    http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Brown_v_Coleman.php

    https://www.agentxtra.net/extranet/S...LinkID=5189306

    http://www.chanrobles.com/commonweal...l#.UCd706O1fAk

    http://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsi...06/806.04.html

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...3.15118_1.html

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...7.77-1383.html

    http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/...1.15703_1.html

    http://www.vsb.org/docs/sections/tru...spring2009.pdf

    http://www.coloradobrownfields.org/i...state-glossary

    For many more references, simply put the following in Google's search box: taxpayer is a cestui que trust

    Just a wonderful short read: http://livefreenewzealand.org/trusts.php



    Do you believe it exists now? I do. Some may ask, "How do we get this genie out of the bottle?" or "Who do we shoot with our magic bullet?" As for me, I can see land after being lost at sea for these past 44 years. I am currently drafting a most excellent letter. A letter that is sure to strike some nerves.

    I have faith that some of you will FEEL what I have to say and will share the information with others. Some of you may even attach a letter with your own, unique and wonderful story. How many of you are willing to walk on dry land with me?

    I will post this letter tomorrow. The title will be "Who are YOU?"

    With love,

    your brother, Micha; reborn name, one of you / Phillip Michael; given name, lost soul / PHILLIP MICHAEL SANDERS; trusted friend, mentor (once you read my letter, this will be made clear)


    I am...

  5. #25
    I was asking the question at the 4:00 Minute Mark!


    So my comments about Robb's theory are not about cestui que trust and its use in America. I was talking about the application of the cestui que vie Act of 1666. Please understand the distinction.

  6. #26
    Sorry David. I wasn't directing that at you, just sharing. Some of those old books are amazing. Look what I found this morning- Name:  rights 2.jpg
Views: 1167
Size:  79.8 KBName:  rights.jpg
Views: 1227
Size:  90.2 KB Anyone see the importance of this?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •