Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: A rose by any other name does not change the fact that its still a rose

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    A rose by any other name does not change the fact that its still a rose

    I would suggest that what you call yourself, your name has little bearing in a court of law, its the roll you play.

    What part do you play in court has more bearing on jurisdiction and the capacity of the court to try you than most other common issues, many in the freeman, sovereign movement.

    When you show up in court which hat do you wear, beneficiary/grantor (stock holder), executor (administrator), or the trustee (emplyee).

    Do you want to be the libel party, taking full liability.

    If we look at it as a large corporation for the ease in understanding, we may find some clue.

    Who holds all the power in a corporation. Well it certainly is not the employee, they take orders from the administrator. The administrator is elected by the stock holders. ie investors who would seem to be the libel parties and hold all the power. Can an investor be the administrator.

    So in relation to your corporation/trust which position do you want to hold.

    When you go to court, what is the presumption the court holds about your position.

    In what ways do they trick us into becoming public servants/employees.

    Who is obligated to obey the laws of the corporation/trust.

    Know who you are. fB

    Your Thoughts
    Last edited by Frederick Burrell; 10-02-11 at 12:40 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •