No. So it IS.
You are the lone person I have met across several message boards who has such vehement objections to "the Informer" ... well... other than attorners.....
In addition, you are the only person who hasn't looked at the cites either.
To the attorners' credit, they will review the material at the very least.
David reviewed the material. He stated his objections in a reasoned and rational manner in complete contradistinction to you.
The material has presented in earnest to those interested therein. It does not signify a wholesale endorsement of anything and everything "the Informer" says.
But, I have to tell ya' .... its been very, very, VERY hard to stump him
.
The material is based on ARCHIVAL and HISTORICAL research. So, if you desire creativity, this ain't it !!
After this, I'm dropping it. You'll come back to this material when you are ready and right now ... clearly you ain't ready!
This is my conclusion of "feeding pearls to swine".
---> So, I say!! <---