Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Recovery from Pete's Cracking the Code

  1. #1

    Recovery from Pete's Cracking the Code

    This document package tells quite a story if you are willing to take some time examining it. I suggest you open it in a separate window and I will guide you through by Page #.

    This particular Libel of Review (LoR) has two different expressions of default judgment. They are identical in wording. The suitor couple first published default judgment at the county clerk and recorder, or in this Eastern example, the Register of Deeds (RoD). They published it timely (after the 21 days on the summons) but I did not make it clear that they had to file the Return of Service (proof of service) into the USDC so that was delayed a few weeks. Fortunately it came up in conversation before the six month deadline. So they filed it, but it was a bit later than typical, but in time for the rule of the court. However, just after the six month deadline the federal judge issued an order (Page 14) to show cause why the cause should not be dismissed because the plaintiffs had not filed a Return of Service with the court. This was Refused for Cause (R4C) with some corrective explanation on the R4C itself (Page 15).

    When the Wife published the initial default judgment at the RoD as is typical, the Judgment did not have any USDC markings on it yet. There was an attorney who overheard the conversation and offered his wrinkley nose advice to index the judgment as a Notice, not a judgment; Pages 4-7. This never sat right with the suitor couple. So at the time of the above R4C on the judge's order to show cause Wife prepared the second default judgment, Page 1 and after a few weeks contemplation it arrived in the mail, a properly FILED foreign judgment in the USDC. Now you see, it is ready to be published at the RoD and this time properly indexed as a Judgment.

    Pages 8-9 reflect something not very detailed in the document package. Detailing all the wonderful things and getting that size of a package sanitized is just too much to try conveying. So I grabbed one of the nasty Frivolous Filing warning letters, not even the correct years to convey the flavor. The suitor couple were hit for two years each, for a total of $20K in frivolous filing fines for the two years they were subscribing to Pete HENDRICKSON's Cracking the Code zero income technique. This suitor couple were what we call "researchers" for a while while learning within the suitors' brain trust but it was not until they were facing the $20K bill that they decided it was time to get to work and file the Libel of Review.

    The last ten pages are R4C to two different IRS campuses. They happened at the same time though and were filed into the evidence repository together. First we find how the suitor couple does not in fact owe any money at all to the IRS, much less the $20K frivolous filing fee.


    Second we find that the IRS is re-processing the initial Libel of Review. ?€“ Which of course articulated the accusation of fraud by omission; If we had known we could be redeeming lawful money instead of endorsing private credit from the Fed we would have done so since our first paychecks ever!
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-22-12 at 12:49 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Within the confines of my own skin.
    Posts
    752
    Hey David,

    That sure is a lot to go through to for relief from something like that, but if it worked kudos to you. I am attaching something I did a few years back to release a garnishment on wages the local state DOR put on my labor, it might assist in shortening up that process without having to go to court to do it, this was handled via PAP - private administration process. Part 2 is the PDF showing the actual garnishment letter and page 2 showing the release of garnishment. It is a matter of reversing the process that which they do to the names we use. They did not respond until the end.

    garn-rel.zip

    After I had done this they definitely knew who I was, I could not even sit in as a witness at tax hearing supporting anyone from local community, eventually they would escort me out before they even started after the assistant SOR wiped the sweat from his brow.
    Last edited by motla68; 11-05-11 at 02:51 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Treefarmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    in the woods known to some as Tanasi
    Posts
    476
    Blog Entries
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by motla68 View Post
    Hey David,

    That sure is a lot to go through to for relief from something like that, but if it worked kudos to you. I am attaching something I did a few years back to release a garnishment on wages the local state DOR put on my labor, it might assist in shortening up that process without having to go to court to do it, this was handled via PAP - private administration process. Part 2 is the PDF showing the actual garnishment letter and page 2 showing the release of garnishment. It is a matter of reversing the process that which they do to the names we use. They did not respond until the end.

    garn-rel.zip

    After I had done this they definitely knew who I was, I could not even sit in as a witness at tax hearing supporting anyone from local community, eventually they would escort me out before they even started after the assistant SOR wiped the sweat from his brow.
    "Our heavenly Father has a thousand ways to provide for us, of which we know nothing. Those who accept the one principle of making the service and honor of God supreme will find perplexities vanish, and a plain path before their feet."
    Desire Of Ages, E.G. White, p. 330.

    The plain path may look complicated at times, but it is the straightest and most direct path which causes the one who follows it to overcome all obstacles.

    motla68, it is unfortunate that you are not able to articulate your thought processes in a way so that other people, like myself, can figure out of what you speak. According to the statistic counter you have 598 posts here, but you have failed to make plain what your PAP consists of, what law structure it is based on, or how and why it should work for a man/woman.

    I know you have tried, because I have tried to read and comprehend your posts in which you have tried. I've even read some of the posts in which you've bickered back and forth with shikamaru, just to see if I could figure out how you think.
    But it hasn't helped.

    I cannot make head nor tail out of what you are presenting here.
    I encourage you to pay attention to what shikamaru has been trying to communicate to you. He is not antagonizing you from what I can tell, he is trying to show you good communication technique, which may help you express yourself intelligibly to other forum members, if you were to make use of it.

    Please keep trying.
    Be blessed
    Treefarmer

    There is power in the blood of Jesus

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •