Libel of Review and $39 Miscellaneous Evidence Files

[looking for truth]

I have only heard of libel of review from Winston Shrout. He basically uses it as a catchall way of re-opening 'completed cases', and recommends using the fact that the charges were never certified onto the record as the usual basis.

It seems like you are using the libel of review to get a heap of information onto the public record, in relation to you the man, and your transmitting utility. You seem to be aware that it is likely to fail as an action in this regard however, and that makes me wonder whether its value is that, "once its on the public record its THERE on the public record" win or lose?

[ProfessorPhi]

Hello David Merrill,

How do you square the text of the FRCivP Rule 60(e) when applying the use of the LoR as a remedy?


Cordially,


ProfessorPhi