Yes, a counterclaim. Suitors have been doing this last part for years now. The Certificate of Search functions as a standing judgment - Failure to State a Claim for which Relief may be Granted.
This is the first time I have seen the entire Emergency addressed so efficiently.
The Libel of Review focus is on the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act.
The reason that I asked the questions I did is because of this efficiency, you may be opening up some innovations. My Comptroller Warrant to the IMFIRS (in accord with Are You Lost at C?), by the timing alone triggered the Montana Freeman Standoff by pressing for pre-1861 lawful money as I avoided citing the UCC with my "endorsement".
Ergo, if you were to sanitize the SSN and account #, publish this notice at the county clerk and recorder there today or Monday, and the Government were to shut down you might have some interesting synchronicity. You are actually making a lawful stand against the entire extraordinary occasion, are you not? I think if you published it locally and at the secretary of state too (postmarked today) - in lieu of UCC as common law - then you might very well be making history.
I recognize your asseveration as the kind of thing I would do and have often done. Therefore I am giving recognition namaste' - which is to say that I recognize the Holy Spirit of God guides you in your endeavor. It is obviously nothing more than an attached and fully incorporated demand for lawful money designed to be filed with any Signature Card on a non-interest bearing checking or savings account but I doubt you will have any luck getting it filed with a bank until you have the apostille of the SoS on it. - Maybe the Department of State.
Look at this Notice on the second page:
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6262/20mlien16.jpg
http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/9568/20mlien17.jpg
So you might just leave the SSN and account # blank to be filled in by hand when opening or proposing the novation to a current account. Likely, you will get a rejection from the SoS at first instructing you to utilize a UCC-1 Finance Statement but at that time, the SoS is recognizing the UCC will be binding law.
Ergo why I am saying you may move this into the larger "private" of Federal Reserve Banking and the entire scope of fiat currency.
Regards,
David Merrill.