Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Capitalism = private war

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Cool thread!

    I suppose this is probably too time consuming but I came across it today so it is on my mind.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Cool thread!

    I suppose this is probably too time consuming but I came across it today so it is on my mind.
    How I see this that we seek to build our fortress of security from the private war of capitalism.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Cool thread!

    I suppose this is probably too time consuming but I came across it today so it is on my mind.
    The 13th amendment listed in that document is very interesting.

  5. #5
    I came across one technique yesterday:

    http://www.cryptohippie.com/products_roadwarrior.php

    The method as expressed in admiralty to the admiralty is Libel of Review. Find the same Thirteenth Amendment applied to a territorial survey decades later!

    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_969.jpg
    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_970.jpg
    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_971.jpg
    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_972.jpg
    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_973.jpg
    http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_974.jpg

    Get this! - The Infection is how many people were ordering up this document package that my clerk had it taped up in the Records cubicle.


  6. #6
    Maybe capitalism, socialism and capitalism are pretty much the same or part of the same coin especially in view of observation that socialists posing as capitalists is what USA-ians have experienced since WWII. Perhaps they are "capitalists" when they want "deregulation" (i.e. lack of barriers to entry) and then conveniently they are "socialists" when they want to keep competition away. When they get into extreme control-freak mode about competition then they are "communists". The idea that "The State" or "The City" (Metro) should have final say over resources is socialist..and even capitalists idea that the State could give them the unlimited right over resources is.. rather.. socialist. Consider communism as being a fancy group psychology technique to get millions of folk to oppress each other so that the 'secret oligarchy' can have less competition at having fancy things that the plebes "aren't supposed to have".

    The right of men to choose how they want to apply their talents IMHO isn't a "capitalist" concept. Capitalism, socialism and communism seem to all deal with centralized resource control.

    So perhaps what one has is a 'secret oligarchy' waging war against what they call "the masses" through capitalism, communism and socialism?
    Last edited by allodial; 06-10-12 at 04:18 AM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  7. #7
    I think that the natural process of The Economy being that government debt is considered 'money'.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
    Maybe capitalism, socialism and capitalism are pretty much the same or part of the same coin especially in view of observation that socialists posing as capitalists is what USA-ians have experienced since WWII. Perhaps they are "capitalists" when they want "deregulation" (i.e. lack of barriers to entry) and then conveniently they are "socialists" when they want to keep competition away. When they get into extreme control-freak mode about competition then they are "communists". The idea that "The State" or "The City" (Metro) should have final say over resources is socialist..and even capitalists idea that the State could give them the unlimited right over resources is.. rather.. socialist. Consider communism as being a fancy group psychology technique to get millions of folk to oppress each other so that the 'secret oligarchy' can have less competition at having fancy things that the plebes "aren't supposed to have".

    The right of men to choose how they want to apply their talents IMHO isn't a "capitalist" concept. Capitalism, socialism and communism seem to all deal with centralized resource control.

    So perhaps what one has is a 'secret oligarchy' waging war against what they call "the masses" through capitalism, communism and socialism?
    A difference in socialism and capitalism is the corporation one desires to be ruled by.

    Capitalism is for private corporations.
    Socialism is for public (government) corporations.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by shikamaru View Post
    A difference in socialism and capitalism is the corporation one desires to be ruled by.

    Capitalism is for private corporations.
    Socialism is for public (government) corporations .
    So it depends on how thin or how thick your oligarchy/aristocracy is? Or how deep or shallow the rabbit hole is?
    Last edited by allodial; 06-13-12 at 12:14 AM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
    So it depends on how thin or how thick your oligarchy/aristocracy is? Or how deep or shallow the rabbit hole is?
    Take your pick

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •