Now, I am among the first to state that A4V, is not a valid Pleading, but here is what I was looking at ..

Your comments, please on this investigation

A4Vs were
authorized by Title 3 of the US Code.
Title 3 deals with the Office of the President. I found
the attached document at www.lulu.com and it is from The American
Connection copyright 2007.

Specifically the aspect of Title 3 that pertains to A4Vs is the President's
Oath.
His oath is different from those in Congress specified in Title 5.
The Title 3 oath makes the President the Trustee for the United States for
the benefit of us the beneficiaries.
Title 5 oaths make no one a trustee.
Without the President's oath there would be no trustee and therefore no
trust or beneficiaries and A4Vs would not be legal. Perhaps there is a partial justification
about Title 3, but there is more enabling the use of A4Vs.
If you want to read this, I would advise you to read it in sections and let each
section percolate before you go on.
It is a string of legal arguments, and
we can now see why all the district and circuit court judges were heavily
involved with defining processes for debt set asides in 1987, 2000 and
2003.
It is a bit confusing, but follow each legal thread and you will
get perhaps some idea of what I am asking

Pay attention to Title 3, UCC 201 (44), UCC 3-303, UCC 3-415.