Historical Priestcraft - Monetizing Sin - Oath-mongering

[David Merrill]

NYGman-Tax;


For your benefit I am endeavoring to show the historical basis and even mathematics of language (reproducible mental objects) or law behind the concept of redeeming lawful money. The premise you have designed here is faulty. You are demanding to know the "authority" by way of common law and common law is by your own demands correctly stare decisis - case law. The appeals justices are never allowed to practice law. They have to rule on authorities that are a collection of opinions and decrees of predecessor appeals courts. Case law. For this to happen there would have to be a suitor prosecuted for redeeming lawful money which is never going to happen. But supposing that it were the suitor would have to appeal and the appeal court render an opinion for publication.

The Libel of Review (LoR) is to set up a record, and presumably to train the suitor at record-forming. Being that the federal judge is a taxpayer it is obvious to some that this conflict of interest is self-executing recusal and leaving the suitor with a case file for items of fact like refusal for cause (R4C) the suitor comes into authority as a record-forming court (court of record) and even publishes a default judgment against the Secretary as the US Governor of the International Monetary Fund - United Nations charter law. That is the place where we extend outward into complete resignation of the judiciary as you prescribe in your initial "proof" premise so I will leave that thread to develop as you request while this thread develops as I understand a bigger picture of human history and the esoteric kingdom of heaven becoming exoteric at the time collapse known biblically as the End of Days.

This is better known as global municipal policy embodied in America as the Municipal League or sometimes METRO 1313. I have plenty of images about that. I visited the repository in Aurora while the curator was making some reforms and apparently took a liking to me. She did not have a fee schedule and had never discovered the two banker boxes of METRO 1313 materials so I think she was appreciative and simply gave me free run of the copiers. A member at SJI you may recall commissioned me to visit the ML repository for him so I mailed all the paper to him after I digitized a good portion of it.

Another title for the thread might be Melchizedek and Levi. Levite priests are of a bloodline and Melchizedek is presented without any emphasis on his heritage - Melchizedek we will presume is Elected for his purity in monotheism - for worship to the One True God. Melchizedek appears for collecting tithes from Abraham, who came out of the heart of polytheism in Ur, Chaldea (Kuwait - deep in Babylon). The Israelite nation is characterized basically for recognizing God as a single source of divinity and authority. A basic presumption I make on brain trust discussions is that Melchizedek as Elect, is in authority to administer to Levi, embodied in Masonry here in the West.

I will be going into several hot-button topics about spirituality, faith and religion. I know by now that many folks will want to put in opinions and begin debates and this is going to be really fun. Please keep in mind that I have images to back up why I believe what I say is true and that does not mean I know. I have an objective to this thread which is to compliment NYGman-Tax's thread Basis in Law. My approach will be to stay on my track as there are a lot of facets on my mind as I open the thread. If you have such "distractions" according to me, fine. I learn from you as I go. Please do not be upset or offended if I do not pick up debates with your differing points of view though.

Another item is I become aware how convincing images, especially documents can be. They are also time consuming and invite debate about my interpretation of them too. So I am going to try something new - delivering my opinions about law and history, math and physics without the images. I will add them only when I feel necessary. This will streamline my stream of thought delivery of what I am trying to say. I will be giving minimal time to reading what others have to say except my special guest NYGman-Tax. This thread is for everybody to enjoy but I am going through the trouble for NYGman who is a New York tax attorney that has become curious. [Notice that the man is a who and the TITLE is a what; that may help understand what you read below.]

I want to begin my exploration with I Chronicles 6 where we find that the Levites receive a different inheritance than the other Tribes of Israel. Instead of a territorial claim, the Levites get the 'cities and their suburbs'. This means that the Levites, in order to administer the Laws of Moses to the entire Israelite nation were in authority throughout Israel by municipal jurisdiction. Remember that the first written constitution too, complete with ratification from the Babylonian (Jewish) marshal's (Nehemiah TIRSHATHA) was to adhere to the Laws of Moses - Nehemiah 10. Some have thought, including me, that 'reading of the law' was the Penteteuch (Torah) so we tried it one day after service in the synagogue. It took us four hours to read Genesis so the conclusion is that the Laws of Moses was the reading of the law - Exodus 20-24:7.

Colorado is my model because it seems to be a utility government here. I will be tying this together with custodians of the record mainly through Freemasonry. There is plenty of evidence that this broaches a message given through mathematics so please bear with me as I try explaining this to you in layman terms with minimal attachments. But that is a way to explain it in terms NYGman may be able to use. I have always called this image Resignation of Judiciary. The purpose of constitutions is to keep government in line until the people can establish municipal home rule. METRO is another name for a higher positive law jural society.

I intend to stay the best I can in the subject matter of judiciary - as in the Judiciary Act of 1789:

...'saving to suitors' in all cases, the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it...

[David Merrill]

One item on my mind to contribute to the basis of law is the Fundamental Orders of 1639. This would be a basis for state laws while the Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions Granted to Patroons is the foundation for municipal home rule.

While I look around for the source of this, it may be thought provoking in itself about monetizing sin:





Nope. That is the only thing I saved to disk that day so it looks like I was surfing an Board of Governors paper and grabbed it, titled it Monetizing Sin and moved on. I discovered another paper - a scripture teaching from the brain trust that same time though:

Crosstalk:

XX wrote: Therefore, we see there were many laws given by YeHoVaH prior to Sinai. Furthermore, we see Yehoshuah as Redeemer. A redeemer is one who pays the price for another. Therefore in Equity, the price was paid to buy back those held in bondage under Satan's dominion; and, therefore, Dominion was Lawfully placed in Yehoshuah. Otherwise, to take the Dominion absent Equity, payment for sin, is Stealing and that would have violated YeHoVaH's word and that will not happen.

DM wrote: I view the temple sacrifices as an early Income Tax. Think about that a moment and you might see it the same way. If you were to simply spill the blood of your most perfect livestock that is very expensive. The Levites most certainly did not eat the meat for themselves. This perfect livestock was killed to fuel fire burned to God. It served no functional economic purpose but to drain life substance off of the Israelites in a show of homage over the Golden Calf imagery.

XX’s comment: Certainly sin has a price tag. I was studying Ephesians late last night coupled with Romans – interesting. Notice that “by one man sin was imparted to the Age [World]”. I would like the Reader to consider: Is it possible to sin against a law that does not exist? Before I continue, I have to lay a bit of groundwork. I shall call Adam “The Man” and I...

[doug555]

One item on my mind to contribute to the basis of law is the Fundamental Orders of 1639. This would be a basis for state laws while the Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions Granted to Patroons is the foundation for municipal home rule.

While I look around for the source of this, it may be thought provoking in itself about monetizing sin:





Nope. That is the only thing I saved to disk that day so it looks like I was surfing an Board of Governors paper and grabbed it, titled it Monetizing Sin and moved on. I discovered another paper - a scripture teaching from the brain trust that same time though:

Crosstalk:

See Exchange Contracts vs FRNs article footnote .

This footnote may have been a veiled reference to the demand for lawful money expressing the contract's transaction denomination basis as USNs, and thereby simply rebutting the default presumption of FRNs.

The sin is choosing to use the FRN instead of the USN... which is the choice presented in Mt 22.15-22 ("Give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's...")... and which may the line Yahweh has drawn that Satan cannot cross... just as He drew a line for Satan in not allowing him to kill Job.

[David Merrill]

See Exchange Contracts vs FRNs article footnote .

This footnote may have been a veiled reference to the demand for lawful money expressing the contract's transaction denomination basis as USNs, and thereby simply rebutting the default presumption of FRNs.

The sin is choosing to use the FRN instead of the USN... which is the choice presented in Mt 22.15-22 ("Give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's...")... and which may the line Yahweh has drawn that Satan cannot cross... just as He drew a line for Satan in not allowing him to kill Job.

Arising is the IN GOD WE TRUST; SO HELP ME GOD trust.

In 1863 allegedly there was a religious sentiment in America. A wonderful demonstration of this express trust if found in plain view. IN GOD WE TRUST is seen on the face of the fiat currency. [The Emergency began technically in 1815 or so, with the War of 1812 Era Notes.] We find the circuit completed by the written vow of state officials - like with the Attorney General. The statute (state) makes it clear what that form will be - that it will complete the circuit and trust.

In the alternative we find the City/METRO organization is operating as the priesthood and in priestcrafting has become its own authority - like Michael Joseph has described above. Look at District Attorney Dan MAY's oath of office. It is even accompanied by a $5K insurance policy for breach of oath, malfeasance of office! This shows contemplation. Basically though - Dan MAY's oath of office does not swear before the sovereign authority of God:



There are so many ways to approach this and see the same thing over and over, with or without scripture as the description of trust law. In the end though $5K scarcely covers compensation for even one malicious prosecution or other misbehavior by Dan MAY or any one of the police he is responsible for training in legal matters. Instead of explaining by this, or any other explanation the Tenth Circuit justices chose:

Another approach is through the 1958 development of METRO 1313 - the Municipal League itself. There was quite a pre-Cold War stir about socialism/communism across America as the municipal jurisdiction came of age and emerged out of the state legislature. I have shown the links quite a bit and am hoping a new approach of scanning instead of stopping for the artifacts and evidence will bear fruit. Here is a fuller rendition of the state court prayer though. [Keep in mind that diversity of citizenship (the LoR) is originally intended for remand from federal to state court.] So this demonstration of the $11T slump on the bond due day may inspire some recognition about this humble fellow, still living in peace off the grid among the priestcrafters of METRO organization. In other words his immunity and heritage have been recognized for over a decade:





The latest demonstration is that when we are without title - men and women - families with the same needs we become a class action. Just look at the mess; all the pages of naming suitors in this MERS action. Suitors know each other by true name. This messes with the presumed power of attorney.

[JohnnyCash]

I was curious about the source of that monetizingsin image too. I saw those large-numbered footnotes and figured it must be a large work. And then it hit me - WAIT, I have that book (well, two books as you see). Sure enough, that is page 831 of PIECES OF EIGHT - THE MONETARY POWERS AND DISABILITIES OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION by Edwin Vieira Jr. If there's a particular page you'd like scanned, just say so.

Here's what stands out to me; as an attorney (JD) Mr. Vieira has arguably written the definitive work on the history of money in America. Yet he was unable to resolve the conundrum of lawful money - how a FRN could self-redeem. If he is genuine, and I believe him to be a true patriot (confirmed by the quatlosers bad-mouthing him), the excisable nature of the FRN and our remedy written into law that David Merrill reveals totally escapes Mr. Vieira. I think this speaks to how well this scam (if I may use the term) is hidden from the average reader, and even learned attorneys! Therefore I will have more patience with attorneys like NYGMan as they learn.

[David Merrill]

From the opening post:

This is better known as global municipal policy embodied in America as the Municipal League or sometimes METRO 1313. I have plenty of images about that.

In the college library in Aurora (Denver) on the second floor there is a partitioned area for America's Municipal League records.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter1.pdf
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter2.pdf
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter3.pdf



These letters might give you some flavor of what the early Metro 1313 was about:

http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/9...agerletter.jpg

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/9...agerletter.jpg

http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/263...ftofletter.pdf

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/4...esponselet.pdf

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/3...ponselette.pdf

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/9...parestesti.pdf

[David Merrill]

The basic structure of administering law in America was designed in the Judiciary Act of 1789. By creating the Districts overlayed on the States the Judiciary Act styled - city of Washington, District of Columbia. The city is the municipal jurisdiction same as METRO organization.

Here in Colorado it remains quite evident and housed with the county courts are the district courts. El Paso county and Teller county are Combined Courts - The Fourth Judicial District. The priesthood of judicial administration is still housed in the 'cities and their suburbs' as originally found at I Chronicles 6.

[David Merrill]

I cut that post short as a general inquiry came to mind. This might be the deal breaker!



How can the opposite of money (debt) be considered a derivative of money with any value (in money)?


NYGman is an attorney and therefore has a job to do.

[Michael Joseph]

The basic structure of administering law in America was designed in the Judiciary Act of 1789. By creating the Districts overlayed on the States the Judiciary Act styled - city of Washington, District of Columbia. The city is the municipal jurisdiction same as METRO organization.

Here in Colorado it remains quite evident and housed with the county courts are the district courts. El Paso county and Teller county are Combined Courts - The Fourth Judicial District. The priesthood of judicial administration is still housed in the 'cities and their suburbs' as originally found at I Chronicles 6.

When Jere headed North to Detroit and left Reho back home in Alabama, the Levites with Jere were living off of the tithes and therefore they were receiving an income MUCH higher than the other tribes. Now Jere was interested in keeping his new found power - NOT OF INHERITANCE - made by appointment. So Jere went about the work of setting up idols and changing the day of worship from Saturday to Sunday. By the way notice these are the TWO test commandments - the latter having a perpetual covenant - a Sign between God and His People.

If one keeps Sunday one is obeying a false god and to whom one obeys to that one is one in submission. But back to the Levites. Jere was very interested in keeping his power so he made it impossible for any self respecting Levite to stay associated with the Ten Tribes - including Ephraim and Manasseh. Therefore since Jere setup false idols and LED the people into apostasy - what is new under the sun? - the Levites left town fast and headed South to Alabama [actually Jerusalem- I jest].

Therefore the Levites joined up with Judah and Benjamin [see that Judah stood surety for Benjamin in the Egyptian affair] and the THREE tribes Levi, Judah and Benjamin make up the Kingdom of Judah or you might say the House of Judah.

However the birthright was given to Israel - specifically Joseph's sons = Ephraim and Manasseh. And currently due to the commission of Jeremiah the Throne that was called David's Throne [Actually the Eternal called it His Throne] which used to be in Jerusalem is currently possessed in Israel but one OF Judah sits upon it.

Now Consider that while Judah [3 tribes] are of Jacob, Judah is NOT of Israel. The Jews are ONLY a small subset of Jacob and while the masses confuse the Jews with Israel they are WRONG. In fact most of Jacob is NOT Israel - only Ephraim and Manasseh. The Birthright tribes. Notice that 7 * 360 = 2520 as in years. See Leviticus 26. And notice that in or around 1803+/- the two fledgling nations one a single nation and the other a multitude of nations - began to rise in awesome strength. Said rise was not due to anything THEY did, because mostly Israel is still in Apostasy and Rebellion against the Most High - the rise was due to a promise that Yehovah made to Abraham.

Just as Yehovah protected and supported His chosen people out of Egypt - today if you will hear his voice. Mankind in a sense is an INSTRUMENTALITY of God to effect His Will in the Earth. Now if you oppose God's Will in Rebellion to your Creator, then you might read Deuteronomy 27 and 28. Also Isaiah 1.

===============

Now regarding the Administration of a State - the Settlors of the State are Sovereign to its creation. Notice also that the Settlors are SURETY for their creation. Notice "We the People" pledged their private estates as surety for a failing system "The United States of America" - but notice that TUSofA was a PERPETUAL COVENANT. Know ye not that the debtor is slave to the lender?

Do you trust me? I have no trust in you.

Joh 2:16 And said unto them that sold doves, "Take these things hence; make not My Father's house an house of merchandise."

Joh 2:24 But Jesus [for His part] did not trust Himself unto them, because He Himself knew all men,

Joh 2:20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this Sanctuary in building, and wilt Thou raise it up in three days?

Joh 2:21 But He was speaking concerning the temple of His body.

Pray tell how many Chromosomes are in each cell? 46 right? Separation of Church and State - HARDLY - that would be Rebellion AGAINST Yehovah.

====================

When will men realize their fantastic BREACH of TRUST and return to THE WAY [psalm 119]? I believe it was LINCOLN who upon realizing that America [Americans = Manasseh] was in deep trouble called for a NATIONAL time of FASTING AND PRAYER AND REPENTANCE.

Today things are MUCH worse and Yehovah will NOT be mocked. Just as Israel was once slaves in Egypt - again Israel [Ephraim and Manasseh] Britain and United States - find themselves slaves to debt. But unless Israel returns in mass to The Way of God and leaves off their Idolatry and Rebellion taught to them by Jeroboam [Jere] they are doomed to the same end.

To the confused reader - I write NOT about the STATE OF ISRAEL - that is the House of Judah and of course the BAD FIG [another teaching for another day] - I write concerning Ephraim and Manasseh. Money being a medium of exchange based on mutual promises as Consideration - which is to say Money can and most often does form a Nexus of Contract - I will do a thing for you EITHER FOR MUTUAL PROMISES OR IN CONVERSION - MONEY. That is to say Contract may encompass Trust Agreement but Trust Agreement may not include Contract. However, try as I may I cannot seem to find MY Signature upon a Note.

Attorney's are fun - just like most everybody else they only know what they know - we deal with the Individual and not a Class. If one is blind who cares about his fancy title. Most likely it is just a license - which begs a Higher Power.

But I know that The Earth is held in USUFRUCT for ALL of the Living. And while Adam OBEYED a different lawgiver and therefore submitted under that Administration - his deed was binding upon his heirs - but we are EACH given Choice - therefore Choose ye this day whom ye shall serve. Yet now ALL THINGS are placed UNDER the feet of Yehoshuah Messiah. Which is to say Yehovah Saves. ALL THINGS friend - there is FREEDOM in Yehoshuah. And the children of the King are free.

Finally ONE Son Qualified - Matthew 4 - and therefore the Good News friend is that the Kingdom of God is near! Yet do not be confused, Aw-dawm or you could say Adam's kind is mostly still subject to Satan, as god. Save a few - elected of God = called ones. And to whom he did predestinate he did prejustify - therefore WHO SHALL LAY ANY CHARGE UPON GOD'S ELECT?

Just because one is a practicing lawyer [attorner] does not mean one is with knowledge - like most trained in submission - they are just going thru the procedures. Why, the majority couldn't be wrong could they?


Joh 2:24 But Jesus [for His part] did not trust Himself unto them, because He Himself knew all men,


One thing attorner's know is Trust - therefore "do you trust me"? Why?

WHAT HATH THE LIVING TO DO WITH THE DEAD?

For no son of Adam will have all dominion in himself - until the Son of The Man who is the Son of God comes - who is the Root [ I AM ] and the Offspring of David - therefore it is His Right - which begs a Kingdom, which begs a Government which begs a Ruler, which begs a Settlor. And yet the masses lift up the little horn with the cry of PEACE and the hope that "human nature" will solve their problems - FALSE HOPE. They are as a prostitute who pays her lovers.

And He who placed all things UNDER His feet by necessity is exempted. People wonder whereof come the Laws of Nations. That is about to make this writer Laugh out loud. But Nimrod began to be mighty and a People began to place their trust in him. And some drawn to power seized on the Legal nature of the Trust effected.

However I can see that the Contract while it is Lawful may NOT be Legal - therefore what is illegal except not-legal. And what is legal except that there exists a Grantor, Trustee and Beneficiary and perhaps a Director which is most times in the Beneficiary - but not always.

Pray tell do you read that the Sovereignty of Yehoshuah is shared with the Subjects - even though they are One body? No! A subject must be CLOTHED in Royalty by a GRANT by the Sovereign. Regarding men's Estates - WHERE DO YOU PLACE YOUR TRUST? Yet those who Overcome in Yehoshuah are no longer called Subject - by Grant - they are called "My Friends".

Who is this who says the Law is no more? For what Kingdom is absent a government? And what government is absent a Law? Therefore "The Law" begs a Lawgiver, and one who will make a USE of said Law. One making a USE of said Law is then made Subject to the Lawgiver - but before the Attorners go and get all giddy - ALL THINGS were placed UNDER the feet of Yehoshuah.

Argue with me and give me your Trust - else "I have no trust in you" - go away boy, you bother me. For if you argue with me, then answer me this, WHY? Do you submit to me as a man of authority? Or are you rebellious in nature? If you don't consent - then say so - but your argument is a witness against you. Do you esteem me to be with power over you? Or can you walk on water?



I claim the precious blood of Yehoshuah, my Redeemer in the name of Yehoshuah ben Yehovah, I am michael joseph a redeemed Son of Yehovah in Yehoshuah of the Tribes of Yisrael (Jacob) and I now set my hand to this expression by my free will act with full liability concerning my dominions under my Redeemer, Yehoshuah and absent intent to trespass, but to live in peace with my neighbors:

Michael Joseph

[David Merrill]

There are three styles to prophecy - initial, ongoing and fulfillment:

Eze 37:15 The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying,

Eze 37:16 Moreover, thou son of man, take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel his companions:

Eze 37:17 And join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in thine hand.

Eze 37:18 And when the children of thy people shall speak unto thee, saying, Wilt thou not shew us what thou meanest by these?

Eze 37:19 Say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of
Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand.

Eze 37:20 And the sticks whereon thou writest shall be in thine hand before their eyes.

Thank you Michael Joseph. That is a great template to pull maybe five quotes about the foundations of law and use. It may very well be that I have to explain Melchizedek and Levi further but you have described the dominions of the Levite priesthood to be levah (the tangle of debt ergo animal sacrifice) and Leviathan - serpent of debt associated with admiralty; to rise above and walk on the water.

Excellent timing!

P.S. I am thinking that the term insanity is described in the word attorney.