Express trust

[pumpkin]

"A licence is a servitude. That is a critically important point.

..... not that they want you to know that.

Just as a passport is property of the US government, a license is property of the state government."

For Indiana, this is not true. It is probably the same in all States. I have found, won't look for it now, a case in Indiana that actually defined what a license is, the court said it is to practice a regulated occupation. Which makes sense if you consider the police power of the State. Some occupations concern public safety, and driving for hire is one of them. If a man can get paid more by driving fast and ignoring signs and lights, that is a clear hazard to public safety.

"Stops the process?"

The rules of court requires certain things. A Claim, a summons, interested party, entitlement, ratification of commencement, are several of which a 'ticket' and the process for infraction enforcement does not provide. Now this is for civil tickets, criminal is a bit different, but several of the same things are still required. But, the rules are not self executing, you must know the rules and provide them to the court. This has worked in two States with civil tickets. They did not give the 'win', but abandoned their cases.