Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 52

Thread: Very interesting development regarding online payment from lawful money account

  1. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldi View Post
    How many have gotten an IRS/State tax refund by indorsing checks with the old restriction of "deposited for credit on account or exchanged for non-negotiable federal reserve notes of face value" ?
    Maybe 10-15 people who report that to me. Maybe 1 of 3 though are complicated by state not refunding while the federal did.

  2. #42
    Since 2009, I've used a specific nonstandard nonendorsement for checks in Canada.

    Exchanged for an equal amount of credit, or Bank of Canada Notes at par value only.
    Non negotiable.
    Per: (first initial last name)

    I've been wondering about the wording of this one. Been wondering if it should be changed.... Thoughts??

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by amosfella View Post
    Since 2009, I've used a specific nonstandard nonendorsement for checks in Canada.

    Exchanged for an equal amount of credit, or Bank of Canada Notes at par value only.
    Non negotiable.
    Per: (first initial last name)

    I've been wondering about the wording of this one. Been wondering if it should be changed.... Thoughts??
    Exchanged for an equal amount of credit, or Non-negotiable Bank of Canada Notes at par value only.
    .

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Exchanged for an equal amount of credit, or Non-negotiable Bank of Canada Notes at par value only.
    .
    Thank you!!!

  5. #45
    Is using the word 'credit' giving credence to their credit system, and showing me to be of 2 minds???? Thought I'd better ask that...

  6. #46
    Is using the word 'credit' giving credence to their credit system, and showing me to be of 2 minds???? Thought I'd better ask that...

  7. #47
    Footnote 4 here is still in my buffer so...


    What you should find interesting is at the end of the Bank of Canada Act, protecting your perfect right to restricted endorsement (non-endorsement). It is natural to deal in lawful money so a special reason must be provided for the Bank of Canada to dishonor your claim and demand!

    Now to your question:

    Is using the word 'credit' giving credence to their credit system, and showing me to be of 2 minds???? Thought I'd better ask that...
    I think you have a point. That verbiage is very oblique and I feel suitors (and I) have outgrown it. However it may still need application in Canada because we resort to §16 of the Fed Act and Title 12 USC §411 here.


    Exchanged for an equal amount of credit, or Non-negotiable Bank of Canada Notes at par value only.
    What do you think of:

    Special deposit only, or Non-negotiable Bank of Canada Notes at par value only.

  8. #48
    Footnote 4 makes sense as it appears that all attempts in Canadian statute secede the definition of Lawful Money of Canada to the US definition.
    Footnote 8 is more interesting as it would appear that at that time Canada was already operating in bankruptcy....

    I have been trying to find the version of the Bank of Canada act that says that. Was it possibly the original?? I haven't been able to find the text yet.

    I think the new non endorsement is good. I'd probably split it for myself though, as almost all checks are taken in Cash.

  9. #49
    I found this while looking... Page 172; left column.


    ...you have never failed to inspire confidence alike in the profession and the suitor...
    I have attached a Canadian rendition of Notice and Demand that is based in public v. private money.

    I think maybe my Google Cloud can upload the Bank Act anymore... let me give it a try. [Be patient, it is huge in this photograph form.] I noticed about 3/4 the way in - Removal of Gold. I can tell you without reading it that this strongly parallels America in 1933. The right to restrict endorsement is at the very end.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #50
    It's of interest that the 'saving to suitors' clause in this journal involves the combination of common law court, while that same court can grant equitable relief.... Perhaps this was the first mixing of jurisdictions of the courts in Canada??

    Thank you for uploading the Bank Act. I found the image you were talking about. It was found in the document called "Bylaws, The Canadian Bankers Association". From looking in the index in the back, it appears that there's more in the Bills of Exchange Act. The page previous to the photograph you took is very interesting as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •