Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: Diminished Money Counterclaim

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Diminished Money Counterclaim

    This form of counterclaim may be very interesting very soon!
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Hi David,

    Is this counterclaim still valid?

    Thanks,
    Bentley

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Bentley View Post
    Hi David,

    Is this counterclaim still valid?

    Thanks,
    Bentley

    Look at the date.

  4. #4
    Another new suitor in the brain trust filed the new counterclaim and the judge is moving to dismiss it as hypothetical. - Meaning since the Treasury has not refused his Refund he has not actually been injured. So he went to the coin shop and paid probably $12 for a $5 US note. Then he went to the store with a witness and they filled out affidavits that they could get no more than $5 worth of merchandise for the US note! Now he has proven the injury from pegging the US note (not to be a reserve currency) to the value of FRN's, a reserve currency...

    (Re: Bourne Supremacy: You can't make this stuff up!)



    > To: David Merrill
    > Subject: US Note actions
    >
    > I purchased a 5 dollar us note, and i am going to spend it today in the
    > action we spoke of. I am preparing the affidavit now. I am planning on
    > taking it up to Capital City tomorrow. Is the other document ready? I forget
    > what you called it, but the explanation of the action described in the
    > affidavit. I will need to get moving early to get everything accomplished
    > in time.
    USDC for the District of State
    Memorandum of Law Case #3:13-cv-123 ABC




    I am First Middle of the NOMEN family and I have been injured financially by machinations causing the US note to be pegged to the Federal Reserve note in value.

    My $5 US note should have bought me $100 worth of merchandise as I spent it on Thursday 4/23/13. This is calculated against the Amendments to the Bretton Woods Agreements (Public Law 94-564) among other historical facts. [International earmark for gold – the IMF Trust Fund is $42.22/troy ounce.] This injury is laid out plainly in the civil suit complaint. US notes cannot be utilized in any way as reserve currency.

    It is incorrect to say that I have only been injured hypothetically. The Federal Reserve System has injured me in substance and fact for my entire adult working life. Now that I redeem lawful money and only have Federal Reserve notes available I find that the lawful money I demand by right is depreciated in value by fractional lending just like reserve currency from the Fed.


    Sincerely,

  5. #5
    bobbinville
    Guest
    Isn't there a difference between numismatic value and the value of a piece of currency? I've got some US Notes; but there's no way that I would ever spend them because of their value as a collectible item.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbinville View Post
    Isn't there a difference between numismatic value and the value of a piece of currency? I've got some US Notes; but there's no way that I would ever spend them because of their value as a collectible item.

    Good thinking! I believe that the US note is a valid currency with numismatic value. - Rather unique I believe.

    I want to relay my joy and excitement with suitor Crosstalk:


    Full federal refund of redeemed lawful money received today!



    Needless to say, although i know it doesnt mean they wont try to bully me later, i am extremely happy right now.



    Also, i havent gotten the pacer thing yet, has there been anyhing happening with the case? I saw where you floated it to the bt about a possible class action.





    I am supposing by my wording below that you all understand I mean there is a remote possibility we might keep the cause going by moving forward as a class. The objective was to get the Refund so all is good.



    I believe the judge may take about ten days to rule about whether there is any cause and jurisdiction now that the US note injury is proven. The Order (below) keeps growing on me, subtle revelation after subtle revelation. – Mostly that the judge did not take the opportunity to try declaring Redeeming Lawful Money some kind of legal gibberish or even misapplied!



    Also – correct me if I am wrong – sometimes I falter on details. I believe this Return was filed with the Secretary in Washington DC? No! I am sorry – the LoR [Complaint/Counterclaim] was sent to a major IRS Campus [Too]. Which is significant anyway! The 1040 Form was inside the Law Suit itself. So the IRS agents and attorneys processed the 1040 form inside the filed Diminished Money Counterclaim attached. That is quite remarkable!





    Regards,


    David Merrill.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 05-12-13 at 09:14 AM.

  7. #7
    bobbinville
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Good thinking! I believe that the US note is a valid currency with numismatic value. - Rather unique I believe.
    Actually, I have FRNs, Silver Certificates (from whence my avatar), Gold Certificates, and National Currency in my collection, all with numismatic value.

    I have also spent USNs; but they are only legal tender for their face value. No store clerk or store manager is going to listen to any argument otherwise.

  8. #8
    JohnnyCash
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbinville View Post
    Actually, I have FRNs, Silver Certificates (from whence my avatar), Gold Certificates, and National Currency in my collection, all with numismatic value.
    I don't suppose you have any images of those National Currency notes ... the taxable ones issued after the National banking acts of 1863?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Another new suitor in the brain trust filed the new counterclaim and the judge is moving to dismiss it as hypothetical. - Meaning since the Treasury has not refused his Refund he has not actually been injured. So he went to the coin shop and paid probably $12 for a $5 US note. Then he went to the store with a witness and they filled out affidavits that they could get no more than $5 worth of merchandise for the US note! Now he has proven the injury from pegging the US note (not to be a reserve currency) to the value of FRN's, a reserve currency...

    (Re: Bourne Supremacy: You can't make this stuff up!)



    > To: David Merrill
    > Subject: US Note actions
    >
    > I purchased a 5 dollar us note, and i am going to spend it today in the
    > action we spoke of. I am preparing the affidavit now. I am planning on
    > taking it up to Capital City tomorrow. Is the other document ready? I forget
    > what you called it, but the explanation of the action described in the
    > affidavit. I will need to get moving early to get everything accomplished
    > in time.
    USDC for the District of State
    Memorandum of Law Case #3:13-cv-123 ABC




    I am First Middle of the NOMEN family and I have been injured financially by machinations causing the US note to be pegged to the Federal Reserve note in value.

    My $5 US note should have bought me $100 worth of merchandise as I spent it on Thursday 4/23/13. This is calculated against the Amendments to the Bretton Woods Agreements (Public Law 94-564) among other historical facts. [International earmark for gold – the IMF Trust Fund is $42.22/troy ounce.] This injury is laid out plainly in the civil suit complaint. US notes cannot be utilized in any way as reserve currency.

    It is incorrect to say that I have only been injured hypothetically. The Federal Reserve System has injured me in substance and fact for my entire adult working life. Now that I redeem lawful money and only have Federal Reserve notes available I find that the lawful money I demand by right is depreciated in value by fractional lending just like reserve currency from the Fed.


    Sincerely,
    Some suggestions regarding the Diminished Money Counterclaim document...

    Regarding Cause of Action #1:
    IMO, one has not "suffered injury" in-fact until one tenders payment in lawful money and the recipient thereof, as an agent of the US, does not convert said lawful money into FRNs at current spot silver price, and then apply said converted FRN amount to the NAME's account with the recipient, and thereby typically and legitimately leave a substantial credit balance in said account against which future bills can be applied.

    If, on the next bill received from said recipient, such a credit balance in not reflected, then, and only then, has one been "injured" in-fact.

    One can use one's past 1040 refund(s) honoring said lawful money demands as proof that lawful money was in your bank account and was tendered as payment to said recipient. Of course, your banking records are also considered non-hearsay evidence of same.


    Regarding Cause of Action #2:
    One cannot "consider their pay to be tendered to them in US Notes". 12 USC 411 only provides for redemption of FRNs, not the issuance of USNs. IMO, all pay is initially FRNs. Thereafter, it is up to each recipient thereof to "demand" the redemption of FRNs upon receipt, which are included annually on an IRS 1040 Form in order for the "trustees" to adjust their accounting accordingly pursuant to the intent of the June 5, 1933 HJR 192 Trust.

    Doug

    P.S. FYI, I have an alternative claim that has not been tested yet at:
    http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p...uct-claim.html

    More information about this Common Law approach is available at:
    http://www.youarelaw.org/key-element...mmon-law-claim
    http://www.youarelaw.org/blog
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5d...HHxOSdEZhANETw
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Trust...06152556295341
    https://plus.google.com/111887705181418285206/posts
    https://www.copy.com/s/WSbD4Nzlh6CR/...nkommonlaw.doc
    Last edited by doug555; 12-07-14 at 03:46 PM.

  10. #10
    JohnnyCash
    Guest
    whatever they're paying you Doug ... is way too not enough.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •