Working with new suitors indeed the trend is to notify the US Government and the Fed Bank. Then serve the local bank.
In some states the clerk of court at the USDC balks at the $46 Miscellaneous Case filing. So if it is worth it to the suitor he will just turn around and file the new or traditional counterclaim for $350. In this example the suitor is a foreign national here on a work permit showing a State refund of $4.5K and a Treasury refund for over $10K!
Crosstalk:
Subject: Want to share some success!
Hello David,
Here you can see result of our work together. I would like to thank you for all the help and advices you have given to me. I will continue to learn from you, other BT members and elsewhere. Please, feel free to share this success story and attachment ( with my name being sanitized/removed ).
Thank you very much.
Another new suitor in the brain trust filed the new counterclaim and the judge is moving to dismiss it as hypothetical. - Meaning since the Treasury has not refused his Refund he has not actually been injured. So he went to the coin shop and paid probably $12 for a $5 US note. Then he went to the store with a witness and they filled out affidavits that they could get no more than $5 worth of merchandise for the US note! Now he has proven the injury from pegging the US note (not to be a reserve currency) to the value of FRN's, a reserve currency...
(Re: Bourne Supremacy: You can't make this stuff up!)
> To: David Merrill
> Subject: US Note actions
>
> I purchased a 5 dollar us note, and i am going to spend it today in the
> action we spoke of. I am preparing the affidavit now. I am planning on
> taking it up to Capital City tomorrow. Is the other document ready? I forget
> what you called it, but the explanation of the action described in the
> affidavit. I will need to get moving early to get everything accomplished
> in time.USDC for the District of State
Memorandum of Law Case #3:13-cv-123 ABC
I am First Middle of the NOMEN family and I have been injured financially by machinations causing the US note to be pegged to the Federal Reserve note in value.
My $5 US note should have bought me $100 worth of merchandise as I spent it on Thursday 4/23/13. This is calculated against the Amendments to the Bretton Woods Agreements (Public Law 94-564) among other historical facts. [International earmark for gold – the IMF Trust Fund is $42.22/troy ounce.] This injury is laid out plainly in the civil suit complaint. US notes cannot be utilized in any way as reserve currency.
It is incorrect to say that I have only been injured hypothetically. The Federal Reserve System has injured me in substance and fact for my entire adult working life. Now that I redeem lawful money and only have Federal Reserve notes available I find that the lawful money I demand by right is depreciated in value by fractional lending just like reserve currency from the Fed.
Sincerely,
P.S. Sanitizing it I notice that the State Refund check has VOID watermarked on it???
Reply With Quote