I like this explanation about lawful money too. It helps one understand why a new suitor files a Libel of Review in admiralty - "common law counterclaim in admiralty".
I like this explanation about lawful money too. It helps one understand why a new suitor files a Libel of Review in admiralty - "common law counterclaim in admiralty".
Hey David, This is the same guy I linked in this thread: http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...hlight=lockean
Wages, hours of labor: page 2249 might be of interest to you.
For the Oregon part (pg 2259) today I journeyed to the library and found that, that law still exists now as ORS 652.110.
I find it highly interesting that they use the term "lawful money of the United States". They also added some squishy language and UCC'ish stuff in there from the looks of it compared to the old language.
Last edited by Brian; 05-07-13 at 05:12 AM.
Beautiful! Synchronicity is the conscious memory that everything is happening all at once; time being an illusion.
Been trying for two days now to listen to StormThunder site. Tried with Firefox,Chrome and Safari. FF & C show it but can't find it.Safari can't even find an address. Just a heads up. Listened and read it many times in the past couple weeks. Excellent explanation. The audio is especially useful when my eyes start blurring from so much reading. Thank you to everyone involved with this website, Rodney.http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/image...s/rolleyes.png
recently I was negotiating an easement for property held in trust. What was interesting to me was that I challenged the language "($10.00) dollars and other valuable consideration" as being too vague. Since I, as Agent for Trustee am making the Deed, I shall choose to make a use of my own terms. So I replaced this queer language with: "for $12,456.00 United States Dollars (demanded lawful money in accord with and per United States Code Title 12 Section 411) paid to the Grantor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged".
I received an immediate call from the Attorney asking was I wanting Cash. I told him to relax and that I was fulfilling the law in love and that the law ONLY requires that I make a demand - what I receive is of no consequence - at least in my mind. And it is my mind that counts. Therefore the soon to be RECORDED AND REGISTERED Deed shall reflect a Demand for Lawful Money.
And Moses' staff turned into a Serpent and ate up their staffs. Or you might say - Dan is a Serpent in the Way - he bites the heels of the Horse [pale] and causes his rider to be cast into the Sea. Take your pick - they mean the same thing!
Did you catch the trick in language. And other valuable consideration - there must be VALUABLE consideration.
Shalom,
MJ
The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.
Lawful Money Trust Website
Divine Mind Community Call - Sundays 8pm EST
ONE man or woman can make a difference!
David, Something else I should say about the above mentioned statute is that is was initially created to prevent companies from paying employees in company credit redeemable only at the company store and other similar situations.
I don't see a difference in being paid in XYZ company credit and being paid (discharged) by the Federal Reserve Corporation. Whats the difference? They are both private companies.
So surfing the UCC laws recently I also meandered upon this neat little piece. "Negotiable instruments do not include money"
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negotiable_instruments
But "Federal Reserve Notes" is not moneyOriginally Posted by Brian
The constitution defines money as such:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1792
As we keep going on to say:
Caveat: The credit to this link is http://www.zerohedge.com/news/histor...reserve-system Submitted by Tyler Durden and TruthInSunshine on 07/05/2012 21:31.
The Non-Federal Reserve-less Non-Bank is just the latest entity & iteration of the literal Ponzi scam that perpetuates pure fiat monetary systems (see remarks/footnotes below regarding Plaza Accord and Nixon Shock, which closed the Bretton Woods pact) that some refer to as fractional reserve banking (see Modern Monetary Theory as described and admitted to in their own publication, 'Modern Money Mechanics' - Modern Money Mechanics is a booklet produced and distributed free by the Public Information Center of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; MODERN MONEY MECHANICS*) , whereby this non-bank entity and front for The Money Masters uses taxpaying slaves, many of whom ostensibly believe they are free and sovereign citizens of a sovereign "nation," as collateral, to conjure what they claim is 'money,' but that which is really debt (since there is nothing of inherent value backing it), from thin air, leveraging it up by many multitudes (money multiplier/deposit multiplier, derivative contracts and other forms of leverage can ratchet this debt up by a magnitude of a thousand times or more from the point of inception/creation), getting a nation to endorse it as monopolistic fiat (and enforce the monopolistic recognition of it as such for the payment debt, both public and private, via codified law and corollary enforcement agencies).
The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, describing, in small part, the ruse of Modern Money Mechanics (quote from Page 6, last paragraph):
"What they [banks] do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts. Loans (assets) and deposits (liabilities) both rise by [the amount of the "loan"]."
When was the last time you lent money to a friend and suddenly found you had more funds?
Theoretically, and just for illustration purposes, even if 95% of loans go bad (or more), the fractional reserve bankers lose nothing. They created this fiat money from nothing and received the protection of the nation in distributing fiat monopoly currency. Not only do they lose nothing, they actually gain any real assets that were pledged as collateral to securitize most of the loans that went 'bad' - Harvest.
Repeat this process of Harvest by first inflating the money supply, getting people deeply indebted (many of whom weren't indebted before), and soon enough, with enough cycles of harvest, what belonged to many will be concentrated in the hands of a few, all via the sham that is fractional reserve banking. It's the biggest scam in the history of mankind.
Once a person grasps this basic concept, they'll understand why events have taken place as they have (Bretton Woods*; Plaza Accord; Federal Reserve Act of 1913; closing of the gold standard in 1971*, etc.), and they'll finally grasp how a select few have rigged the game to be able to harvest assets continually, and concentrate wealth and power, by doing nothing other than maintaining Deep Capture of a nation's legislative and judiciary branches (and executive, in the case of the U.S.) of government.
On August 15, 1971, the United States unilaterally terminated convertibility of the dollar to gold. As a result, "[t]he Bretton Woods system officially ended and the dollar became fully fiat currency, backed by nothing but the promise of the federal government." This action, referred to as the Nixon shock, created the situation in which the United States dollar became the sole backing of currencies and a reserve currency for the member states. At the same time, many fixed currencies also became free floating.
If you could print a currency at no cost, that had no intrinsic value, and get the legal system to recognize it as the only legally permissibly 'tender' to satisfy all debt, public and private, would you print as much as you could, loan it out to as many entities and people as you could, and sit back, not caring whether 90% or 9% of the loans were repaid, since it cost you nothing to produce the loan, meaning that you can only gain assets (securitized) and indebt institutions (create indebted parties that you can then garnish), and literally lose not one atom of anything of inherent value?
Further, if you had access to an entity that could do the above, and you could borrow that currency at absurdly low interest rates, and moreover, you had an express or at least implicit taxpayer guarantee against losses (too big to fail), would you also not do exactly the same?
If you're the former entity, you literally can lose nothing, no matter how reckless your actions or lending standards.
If you're the latter party, your risk of loss is inconsequential, since you're backed by the taxpayers (involuntarily), and even if you weren't, if you're a very large entity able to tap absurdly low interest loans from the former, unless you are galactically idiotic on a level that equals Lehman or beyond (where derivatives did them in, along with a non-bailout), you'd be hard pressed to lose money if even - completely hypothetical and arbitrary % - 20% of the cheap interest money you borrowed and then re-loaned out wasn't paid back to you.
If you're the former, you have not only no risk, but you can't possibly lose anything, since your investment is nothing.
If you're the latter, your risk is incredibly small.
This is why our economy, under fractional reserve banking practices, using currency created from thin air, tied to absolutely nothing of inherent value, and bestowed monopoly status as legal tender, is a factual, literal Ponzi Scheme.
This is why we had to close the gold standard, lest we couldn't show "growth" (even though it was merely nominal, credit/debt based transactions) in our official GDP going forward.
You don't even have to tie the fiat to gold in order to force the economy to produce honest numbers and detect the real level of economic growth or contraction: tie the currency to anything that has inherent value, and that can be stored, and that isn't infinite in quantity.
The mind bender part for the newly initiated (as I was at one time) to the Matrix is that there's no real 'debt' from the perspective of the fractional reserve central bank; it's hard for those steeped in conventional economics to rip out the notion from their brain that the fractional reserve central bank can't lose anything (they didn't lend anything of value or that cost them anything - they have ZERO skin in the game), and that their favored entities that are TBTF have only slightly less risk (because they will always be able to socialize their losses via taxpayer bailouts in the wake of busts, while they retain their ill-gotten gains during the booms), and that what most refer to as debt in this system is only a liability for the debtor. If the debtor doesn't repay what was they borrowed (a monopoly currency that cost the lender nothing to produce), they can lose their farm, construction equipment, home, machinery, infrastructure, vehicle, etc. that was used to securitize or collateralize the loan, or even if the loan was unsecuritized, they can at least see their revenue or wages garnished, be sent into involuntary bankruptcy (where their general pool of assets will be seized upon by creditors, including lenders), and squeezed in other ways.
The only way to avoid this is to not play the game. During crack up booms, you miss out on fiat-based gains, if you don't play the game, and the incentive for playing that game is that if your timing is correct, you can get rid of all debt and convert the excess fiat gains into hard assets having inherent value or other things of inherent value, before the fractional reserve alchemists induce another inflationary-deflationary (or vice-versa) harvest.
If one were fortuitous enough to play the game, and have the skill and/or luck to convert fiat gains into real wealth before the boom turns to bust, they'd probably be idiotic to repledge their real wealth assets as collateral for loans ever again (I say probably, because there are exceptions to every general rule, but these people would have to be extremely smart, competent and or connected to the alchemists in such a way that they'd be assured a bailout in the event of another bust whereby their real assets are pledged as collateral for fiat loans).
The Harvest is the end game for the fractional reserve bankers and their minions. As just one example of the rape that is harvest, even generations of families that were land rich (let's say a family that has owned two square miles of prime farmland yielding high value crops for three generations, carrying no debt) can find that an economic downturn suddenly forces them to take the step of obtaining a loan, pledging their farm and equipment as collateral, in the belief that the loan will allow them to survive the downturn and become more profitable at some future point - they're now 'harvestable.'
By pledging real assets to secure a loan of fiat money (conjured from thin air at no cost), one is playing right into the hands of The Money Masters.
On the more macro front, all is well in the scam of compelling nations (via Deep Capture) to 'borrow' the very "money" they need to fund their operations.
The Military-Financial-MultinationalMoneyMaster Complex is alive and well.
The Secret of Oz - Winner, Best Documentary of 2010
Money As Debt-Full Length Documentary
The Money Masters - Full Version
Money, Banking and the Federal Reserve
edward mandell house quote to woodrow wilson. Yes I believe he said it
Last edited by Chex; 05-09-13 at 12:00 PM.
Somehow Tyler neglects to call the core of the substitution by name - Special Drawing Rights.
Because gold cannot be printed endlessly, while SDR's can.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote