A member noticed that sometimes the Secretary of the Treasury responds to the Libel of Review with a Motion to Dismiss. This is logical since the Rules of Court and the Summons strongly suggest that the Respondent (Secretary) does not with to go into default.

The very act of making the demand for lawful money is an instruction to the Secretary as principal appointed by congress over the Fed and the OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency). That action of instruction describes and defines the relationship of the suitor over the Secretary.

Understanding that, any and all responses from the USDC, "Judge" and Secretary are typicall Refused for Cause timely by the court of record, the only court of competent jurisdiction present, the new suitor.

One way to explain this simply is to examine the modifications in procedure:

1) on the Summons.
2) that the USDC (at least some of them) is not accepting cash FRNs any longer.

On Page 8 of the Amendments to the Bretton Woods Agreements we find it that the Secretary is also the US Governor of the International Monetary Fund (or in charge of appointing one; same thing*). This has also panned out verified in Canada by them having a named Canadian Governor of the IMF. Traditionally with the old style summons the clerk would tend to change the term for response from 21 Days to 60 Days. Then over the years they seemed to "get the memorandum" as I call it [viewing the federal system as one court under one rule set] and quit altering the summonses. Then as it seems the federal attorneys had time to consider this revision:

Notice how now the Summons simply reads that the term for response is dependent on whether the Respondent/Defendant is a government employee or not, avoiding that embarrassing clerk error to mistake the Secretary (US Governor for the IMF) for a government employee.

The second instance is quite easy to understand as new suitors all around America buying case files instead of discharging the obligation against private credit from the Fed. For many years we have been demanding lawful money for the $350 filing fee and attaching that as the last page of the Filing:


This has been going on for a long time. Here is an example for the filing of a Miscellaneous Case evidence repository:


It is as though the US Government, Congress and clerks of court have gotten the Memorandum FROM NEW SUITORS!!

As I hear it, May 1, the clerks of court are demanding a check or money order. In other words you specify legal tender FRNs, or Lawful Money of the US:

Check: Pay to the Order of ____________
USPS Money Order: Pay to ____________



Regards,

David Merrill.




* Many smaller military bases do not have a Provost Marshal, in which case the Base Commander has chosen to keep that office within the office of Base Commander.