Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 105

Thread: Cracking the Code Failure - Doreen Indicted

  1. #1

    Cracking the Code Failure - Doreen Indicted

    For Contempt of Court.


    Attached below.


    This is likely why I never write a formal book. That seals me into a doctrine when I am still developing and learning about American Remedy in the Federal Reserve Act.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...1----000-.html
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...000-notes.html
    Last edited by David Merrill; 06-10-13 at 08:52 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Brian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Earth, Alpha Quadrant.
    Posts
    142
    He never re-examined his initial material to find what he missed. He still refuses to acknowledge what is discussed on this forum.

  3. #3
    What do you suppose would happen to me if I reported for jury duty in this case with my copy of the internal revenue code under my arm?
    Blessed is he who keeps from stumbling over me.

  4. #4
    I would hope you wouldn't show up initially with the IRC. Bring it AFTER you get on the jury

  5. #5
    Thanks for the update Brian. This is probably why I do not write a book. I keep updated backups of the Suitors Broadcasts on the brain trust in the hands of some of the suitors in case they would like to collate and compile a biography of how remedy described here on this website developed.

    If I were to write a book about this I feel the dynamics would cease. I would be sealed and obligated to protecting any errors in the book.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 06-10-13 at 08:56 PM.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by David Lyn View Post
    I would hope you wouldn't show up initially with the IRC. Bring it AFTER you get on the jury
    Exactly. If I actually wanted to be on the jury I would need to use my best poker face and try to look as "sheeplish" as possible.
    Blessed is he who keeps from stumbling over me.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by John Howard View Post
    Exactly. If I actually wanted to be on the jury I would need to use my best poker face and try to look as "sheeplish" as possible.
    Good plan!

  8. #8
    ManOntheLand
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    For Contempt of Court.


    Attached below.


    This is likely why I never write a formal book. That seals me into a doctrine when I am still developing and learning about American Remedy in the Federal Reserve Act.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...1----000-.html
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...000-notes.html
    Before I saw this, I had just finished posting (on the Response from The Secretary thread) a little analysis of Pete's criminal trial as seen through the lawful money paradigm. Pete and Doreen seem to have had little grasp of how a Federal Court's jurisdiction works when they were involved in the civil proceeding that led to these charges. They incorrectly believe their rebuttal of W-2 forms on forms 4852 removed all presumption of IRS jurisdiction. They incorrectly believed they could enter a Federal Court's Article I jurisdiction as defendants in a revenue case and still have constitutional rights within that venue. They were ordered to file amended returns and refrain from filing CTC returns by a legislative tribunal, not by an Article III court.

    Being ordered to fill out a tax return a certain way seems outrageous if you don't understand that you are being presumed to be under a duty as an officer of the federal corporation. Pete and Doreen are presumed by the Court to know, understand and accept that duty (even if they really don't). They are obligated under that presumption to provide CORRECT information and swear to it on the 1040. Unless one is redeeming lawful money, or establishes the amounts reported on W-2 are wrong (not just that they are not "wages") the W-2 is presumed correct information. Arguing that it is not correct based on ANY legal argument is frivolous in the eyes of the Article I court, because you are presumed to be OBLIGATED.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by ManOntheLand View Post
    Before I saw this, I had just finished posting (on the Response from The Secretary thread) a little analysis of Pete's criminal trial as seen through the lawful money paradigm. Pete and Doreen seem to have had little grasp of how a Federal Court's jurisdiction works when they were involved in the civil proceeding that led to these charges. They incorrectly believe their rebuttal of W-2 forms on forms 4852 removed all presumption of IRS jurisdiction. They incorrectly believed they could enter a Federal Court's Article I jurisdiction as defendants in a revenue case and still have constitutional rights within that venue. They were ordered to file amended returns and refrain from filing CTC returns by a legislative tribunal, not by an Article III court.

    Being ordered to fill out a tax return a certain way seems outrageous if you don't understand that you are being presumed to be under a duty as an officer of the federal corporation. Pete and Doreen are presumed by the Court to know, understand and accept that duty (even if they really don't). They are obligated under that presumption to provide CORRECT information and swear to it on the 1040. Unless one is redeeming lawful money, or establishes the amounts reported on W-2 are wrong (not just that they are not "wages") the W-2 is presumed correct information. Arguing that it is not correct based on ANY legal argument is frivolous in the eyes of the Article I court, because you are presumed to be OBLIGATED.
    This article calls that irrecusable obligation.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post

    If I were to write a book about this I feel the dynamics would cease. I would be sealed and obligated to protecting any errors in the book.
    "When you read a book, you are receiving a glimpse into a person at a certain point in their evolution. It should in no way reflect on their entire evolution, nor your own. Which is why finding an author and adopting their belief system is detrimental more than beneficial. Open mindedness and entertaining ideas beyond your field of vision and against your preconceived notions is the path to self discovery."
    Blessed is he who keeps from stumbling over me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •