Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: A good read from a traitor Governor Dewey of New York !

  1. #1

    A good read from a traitor Governor Dewey of New York !

    The 1952 report of the Joint Legislative Committee provided
    a basis for Governor Dewey to renew his efforts for a legislative
    program in behalf of the uncompensated accident victim when the
    New York State Legislature convened in January 1953. In his
    Annual Message, he said:

    "I believe the time has come to challenge the right to drive
    of that small minority who continue to operate vehicles
    without insurance or other evidence of the ability to recompense the victims of their accidents.
    This is not a new departure. Under our Safety-Responsibility Law, drivers who
    are involved in accidents must maintain proof of insurance
    or financial responsibility.

    The present law does not begin,to operate, however, until after the damage is done and
    victims may be dead or permanently incapacitated ....
    "The objections that have been raised to a mandatory insurance
    program can easily be overcome through a welldrafted
    law and sound administration. There is no necessity
    for the creation of a state fund as part of the mandatory
    insurance program.

    The assigned risk plan has served us
    well and can be adapted to meet changing needs. . . .What
    is required is the willingness and determination to devise a
    system which will eliminate the irresponsible motorist from
    ,the highways and maintain the integrity of the insurance
    companies doing business in this state. I am unwilling to
    believe that we lack the resourcefulness or integrity to solve
    the administrative problems."




    IMO it's always good to see tyrannical politicians exposing themselves in this manner! In fact, freedom to travel in ALL 50 states can't be removed from We The People.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    It strikes me that the administrative problem the State wishes to avoid is ownership.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    It strikes me that the administrative problem the State wishes to avoid is ownership.


    It is a sad state of affairs for the citizens of the state, that's for sure!

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    It strikes me that the administrative problem the State wishes to avoid is ownership.
    Thus divided title. The 'OWNER' listed on the Certificate of Title gets to be a patsy or an accommodation party. Best of both worlds? Having their cake and eating it too?
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
    Thus divided title. The 'OWNER' listed on the Certificate of Title gets to be a patsy or an accommodation party. Best of both worlds? Having their cake and eating it too?
    allodial:

    Could you please explain further for those of us not familiar with split title and accommodation parties. Thanks.

    Gavilan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •