-
Junior Member
Court Cases supporting Right to Travel
Here is a compilation of court cases supporting Traveling is a Right, not a privilege.
Barron v Burnside - 121 US 186
Boone v Clark - 214 SW 607
Buchanan v Warley - 245 US 60, 74
Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago - 169 NE 22
Cummins v Jones - 155 P. 171
Deibel v Dreiss - 50 NE 2d 1000 (1943)
Ferrante Equipment Co v Foley Machinery Co - NJ 213 A.2d 208, 211, 49 NJ 432
Gardner v City of Brunswick - 28 SE 2d 135
Hadfield v Lundin - 98 Wn 657; 168 P. 516
Hale v Henkel - 201 US 43
Hoke v Henderson - 15 NC 15, 25 AM Dec.677
In re Hong Wah - 82 Fed 623
Kent v Dulles - 357 US 116, 125
Ligare v Chicago - 28 NE 934
McKevitt et al v. Golden Age Breweries Inc - 126 P.2d 1077 (1942)
Miranda v Arizona - 384 US 436, 491 (1966)
Murdock v Pannsylvania - 319 US 105
O'Conner v. City of Moscow - 69 Idaho 37
Packard v Banton - 44 SCt 257, 264 US 140
Parish of Morehouse v Brigham - 6 S 257
Parish v Thurston - 87 Ind 437 (1882)
People v Nothaus - 147 Colo 210
Robertson v Dept of Public Works - 180 Wash 133 at 139
Rogers Construction Co v Hill, Or - 384 P.2d 219, 222, 235 Or 352
Spann v City of Dallas - 235 SW 513
State v City of Spokane - 109 Wn 360; 186 P. 864
State v Johnson - 243 P.1073
Thompson v Smith (Chief of Police) - 154 SE 579, 580
Weirich v State - 140 Sis 98
Wells v Zenz - 236 P. 485
Western Turf Assn. v Greenberg - 204 US 359
Williams v Fears - 343 US 270, 274
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules