ORDER. The Court dismisses this action for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff's 7 Response to the Order to Show Cause fails to demonstrate that he can satisfy the case and controversy requirement of Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. To meet this requirement, Plaintiff must establish that he has "standing to sue." Town of Babylon v. Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, 699 F.3d 221, 228 (2d Cir. 2012). One element of standing is "injury-in-fact,"
The “Judge” in the matter has failed to recognize the suitor spending a $5 US Note at the face value of a Fed note is “injury in fact”.
However the “Judge” will not supply any order or documentation in the mail for our suitor to Refuse for Cause from his authority as the court of record. In other words the “judge” has no authority because he will not produce a record. The suitor receives nothing in the mail because the “Judge” has not generated any paper!
I wonder if we are witness to a new slang – Judicial Cowardice?
I feel like writing up a Notice of Judicial Cowardice for the suitor to file into the case and see if the clerk of court will publish it on PACER?
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Reply With Quote